[arachne] Re: what can't DOS do ??? (was Re: Mouse? (was BrowserWon't Start In Default Home Page)

  • From: "Frank Vuckovich" <jasorn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:31:44 -0600

On 10/30/06, Rob <robo13@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

Greg,
  There quite a number if Linuxes that will run on the same
old hardware that DOS runs on, and run just as fast. Check
out ttylinux or BasicLinux. Is 3 megs memory and 4 megs of
hardrive too modern? Script files are just as useful as
batch files.
Rob



Yep, there is even a version of linux so small it runs from a floppy. And while linux shell commands are being/have been ported to dos, a linux shell is at least as good.

--
       -----Email by Pine on Slackware GNU-Linux-----

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Greg Mayman wrote:

> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
>
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:24:50 -0600, Jason Dodd wrote:
>
>> Well, that list is good enough to knock dos off of the 'Objective' list
>> of best OSs as it is.  You left off anything that DOS can do that
others
>> can't.
>
> Hmmm... how about running smaller and faster on older slower computers.
>
> And allowing the use of batch files that (almost) anyone can write to
> make the computer do things the way they want them done.
>
>
> ..   ,-./\
> ..  /     \     from Greg Mayman, in Adelaide, South Australia
> ..  \_,-*_/     "Queen City of The South"    34:55 S  138:36 E
> ..       v
>
>
>                  Arachne at FreeLists
> -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
>
>
>
                  Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --


Other related posts: