I haven't mentioned it, but in some of the tests we did use a variable attenuator, and in Thursday's tests we put in and removed splitters, which also had an attenuating effect (in larger jumps). In the recent tests, we never had problems with stations with adjacent NTSC transmissions (of which there are several), but we DID have a problem with WABC-DT, which is adjacent to WNYW-DT. Here's a short list of NY-market DTTs with adjacent-channel assignments (not all are necessarily on the air): Channel 18 - WMBC-DT (adjacent to Class A WEBR-CA on channel 17) 22 - WLIW-DT (adjacent to analong WLIW on channel 21 and WFTY-DT and low-power WVVH-LP on channel 23) 24 - WNYE-DT (adjacent to analog WNYE-TV on channel 25 and WFTY-DT and low-power WVVH-DT on channel 23) 27 - WTBY-DT (adjacent to WNBC-DT on channel 28) 28 - WNBC-DT (adjacent to WTBY-DT on channel 27 and WFME-DT on channel 29) 29 - WFME-DT (adjacent to WNBC-DT on channel 28 and WPXN-DT on channel 30) 30 - WPXN-DT (adjacent to WFME-DT on channel 29 and analog WPXN on channel 31) 38 - WWOR-DT (co-channel with low-power WPXU-LP and adjacent to low-power WNYN-LP on channel 39) 40 - WXTV-DT (adjacent to analog WXTV on channel 41 and low-power WNYN-LP on channel 39) 44 - WNYW-DT (co-channel with W44AW and adjacent to WABC-DT on channel 45) 45 - WABC-DT (adjacent to WNYW-DT on channel 44) 48 - WRNN-DT (adjacent to analog WNJU on channel 47) 51 - WNJN-DT (adjacent to analog WNJN on channel 50) 53 - WFUT-DT (co-channel with low-power WKOB-LP and adjacent to analog WTBY on channel 54) 56 - WCBS-DT (adjacent to WLNY-DT on channel 57 and analog WLNY on channel 55) 57 - WLNY-DT (adjacent to WCBS-DT on channel 56 and analog WNJB on channel 58) 61 - WNET-DT (adjacent to analog WRNN on channel 62 and W60AI on channel 60) Not all of those pairs are co-located, but WNYW-DT on channel 44 (246 kW) and WABC-DT on channel 45 (182 kW) are both in midtown Manhattan. TTFN, Mark Richard Hollandsworth wrote: >It took awhile, but I think I've seen the results for all of the tests >conducted in Mark Schubin's apt. Nowhere did I see any mention of trying a >simple attenuator to reduce the signal. > >Since the strong signals (esp Analog stations) would be pushing both the tuner >RF Front End and Mixer into the high intermod region, an RF Attenuator (e.g. >R-S 15-678) would reduce the signal going into the tuner and thereby push it >into a more favorable operating region with increased SFDR (Spurious Free >Dynamic Range). > > > >--------------------------------- > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > >- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >FreeLists.org > >- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.