[x500standard] Re: FW: Operational security
- From: "Jean-Paul Lemaire" <jean-paul.lemaire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <x500standard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'SG17-Q2'" <tsg17q2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:05:14 +0200
Erik,
I forgot to answer to your previous email about that and I apologize for
that. I think there is no redundant information in the Bind. I agree with
your text for 8.1.1 (which contains the correction of DTC 1).
Best regards,
Jean-Paul.
_____
De : x500standard-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:x500standard-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Erik Andersen
Envoyé : samedi 14 juin 2008 10:39
À : Directory list; SG17-Q2
Objet : [x500standard] FW: Operational security
Hi Folks,
I never got any reaction on below message and I gave up resolving the issue
myself due to lack of time. If there is redundant information in the Bind,
it will stay there, at least for a while.
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Mobile: +45 20 97 14 90
e-mail: era@xxxxxxx
http://www.x500.eu <http://www.x500.eu/>
<http://www.x500standard.com/> http://www.x500standard.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Andersen [mailto:era@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 1. maj 2008 18:05
To: Directory list; SG17-Q2 (tsg17q2@xxxxxxx)
Subject: Operational security
Hi Folks,
I seem to be continuously tangling with old litter from the Operational
Security amendment. It has cost me an enormous amount of time, first to try
to clean it up and having failed on that then to clean it out.
I believe, we still have something left in the Bind. I have produces a small
piece of text to show the difference between the current state of Bind and
how it looked in the second (1993) edition. Most of what has been added we
want to keep, but some should probably be deleted. Could you please advice
me on what to keep and what to bin?
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Mobile: +45 20 97 14 90
e-mail: <mailto:era@xxxxxxx> era@xxxxxxx
<http://www.x500.eu/> http://www.x500.eu
<http://www.x500standard.com/> http://www.x500standard.com/
Other related posts:
