Re: [Wittrs] On the Concept of a Game (Philosophical Investigations)
- From: kirby urner <kirby.urner@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:01:38 -0700
>
> [I]n one of the great underappreciated books of the twentieth century
> Bernard Suits gives perfectly persuasive necessary and sufficient conditions
> for something's being a game.
>
> In this note, it is shown that the conditions Suits and Hurka celebrate are
> neither necessary nor sufficient for something's being a game.
>
>
Chuckle.
This game of deciding "what's a game" sounds like language on vacation to
me.
Where's my sun tan lotion?
Kirby
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://undergroundwiki.org/pipermail/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org/attachments/20110628/b2ac2b69/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Wittrs mailing list
Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org
Other related posts:
- » Re: [Wittrs] On the Concept of a Game (Philosophical Investigations) - kirby urner
