[Wittrs] Re: Is the von Neumann Interpretation Dualistic?
- From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:00:49 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Polanik <jPolanik@...> wrote:
> according to von Neumann's notation, 'III' represents the 'actual
> observer'; and, according to his analysis, III, the actual observer,
> the abstract I, is non-physical.
Abstract implies non-physical. I'm not sure why you are making a big
deal over that.
> hence, the von Neumann Interpretation is dualistic.
You are not the first person I have heard asserting that a belief in
abstract objects implies dualism. And I suppose you will not be the
last. But, really, it is completely absurd.
Regards,
Neil
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
