... alright, I'm trying to fool around with structured discussion topics. I don't really know how to do this, so expect plenty of "reforms.' But here is what I have so far. 1. I think it would be prudent to have structured discussions about once a month. People who criticize this list as being far more about personal aspirations than about substantive discussion of Wittgenstein's writings seem to have a valid point. 2. But I don't want to create an administrative solution here. I want a market-driven one. I'm not going to shape and control these things. All I'm going to do is what FDR promised for capitalism: I'm just going to set up the infrastructure (and the rules of the game). If people here are too lazy and uninterested, well, we'll have to reply to our critics by quoting the Nebuchadnezzar of football, Brett Favre, who often says, "It is what it is." 3. Here are the rules as I presently conceive them: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrcal/ ; (feel free to offer improvements!) 4. Here is our calendar page: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrs-cal 5. What I am anticipating is that someone comes along and says something like: I propose to discuss W's views on religion. Let's read X, Y and Z. And then someone will reply in some manner (let's do it later; let's read Q instead; ok, fine; etc.). And when two or more heads agree to a project, the thing is "on" I'm hoping we won't have more than 1 a month (or at least more than 1 going on in any 2 week span) because people are busy and the discussion will turn too local in a hurry. I know myself that I might participate in a discussion even if i don't like it if I know it is in advance and lots of people will do it. So let's keep the calling of a discussion topic for special things. Things we don't know and are curious about, or things we violently disagree over and want to have a "trial" of sorts. (not the right word). Also, I suppose that in the future, we'll discuss the discussion PLANS on amr, but have the discussion itself in COMMONS. I'm trying to keep COMMONS down to no more than 5 mails a day. If we start this, the discussion week could swamp that quota. So mails like this in the future I'll keep on amr. Yours in need of feedback Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. Assistant Professor Wright State University Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org SSRN papers: http://ssrn.com/author=596860 Discussion Group: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/