[C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke
- From: kirby urner <kirby.urner@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:44:35 -0800
> Do I have that right (Kripke v. Wittgenstein)?
>
>
Any investigation of PNs has to include that they're just as easily
fictional (e.g. Mickey Mouse). Any redux of PNs that neglects the fictive
possibility is of course immature and worthy of no further consideration.
Or would philosophers disagree. :)
Kirby
Other related posts:
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- jrstern
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke - kirby urner
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- Sean Wilson
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- J D
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- Sean Wilson
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- J D
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- Sean Wilson
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- J D
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- Sean Wilson
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- Sean Wilson
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- J D
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- J D
- » [C] [Wittrs] Re: Proper Names --Wittgenstein, Russell, Kripke- J D