[Wittrs] Posting Rules
- From: Sean Wilson <whoooo26505@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
... yes, I think the idea about dissing-ideas-without-showing and not
mentioning the person only applies to your discussant. It surely does not
apply to published philosophers. "Discussant" would be slightly broad,
however. It includes all list members. So X could not say to Y that Z is a
fool, where Z is a list member.
Please note that the same may not apply to other lists' or their members .
Inasmuch as these are dancing rules, and we are not "dancing" with them, one
would leave the matter to freedom (I suppose).
Regards and thanks
Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq.
Assistant Professor
Wright State University
Redesigned Website: http://seanwilson.org
SSRN papers: http://ssrn.com/author=596860
Twitter: http://twitter.com/seanwilsonorg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/seanwilsonorg
New Discussion Group: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html
________________________________
From: kirby urner <kirby.urner@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 11:03:43 AM
Subject: [Wittrs] Re: When is "brain talk" really dualism? (nominalism, yet
again)
Sean, point of order if you're listening: I put Quine I think it was
on my list of suspected dweebs, which might be considered ad hominem,
but the thing is, he's not on this list so I'm not doing a one-on-one
illegal hand hold like in baseball or whatever it is. Is it OK to
flip a bird to someone way up in the stands?
.
Other related posts:
- » [Wittrs] Posting Rules - Sean Wilson
