The Mitsar system is a high-end, quality oriented product in my professional experience and opinion. However, the complexity of the software at times borders on being overwhelming. On a positive note, the WINEEG can do many advanced things. On the down side, it does not tell you what a problem is when something doesn't work, and needs to be STREAMLINED. For it to become more attractive to the average practitioner, the WINEEG software needs to be greatly SIMPLIFIED. Many things can be condensed into programming subroutines that can be achieved by just clicking on a button. Finally, FDA-registration is crucial for liability reasons and those of us in the trenches. If I can be of further help, please let me know. Also, wanted to let you know your company could not have a better representative in the USA than Dr. Leslie Sherlin. He is always helpful and responsive. Professionally yours, Robert E. McCarthy, PhD, LPC, CCMHC, BCIA-EEG Licensed & Board Certified Professional Counselor Fellow, American Association of Integrative Medicine Associate Fellow in EEG, Biofeedback Certification Institute of America In a message dated 3/5/2008 9:26:46 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, alexandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: Dear Users, Mitsar company kingly ask you to help us and answer the following questions: 1. Is there enough information included in patient card in WinEEG software? If not, what exact fields would you like to additionally include? 2. Is it necessary to improve or redesign the WinEEG final protocol drawing? Are there any standard forms or requirements that you think should be implemented for the final report drawing. If so, we would be very grateful for examples. All provided information is necessary is helpful in improving the software to benefit you the Mitsar products user. Thank you very much for you help. Best regards, Mitsar Co. staff **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)