[windows2000] Re: Mandrake vs. Suse
- From: Chris Berry <chris_berry-list-windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:05:27 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin, Eddie wrote:
| Probably go with suse. I had bad experiences with red hat 9.0 and
drivers.
LOL, well it was a fork of Red Hat 5.0 so that shouldn't be an issue.
They split off because RH was going with Gnome and Mandrake went with
KDE for their window manager.
- --
Chris Berry
chris_berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Systems Administrator
JM Associates & Coast Business Service
"To the pessimist, the glass is half empty. To the optimist, the glass
is half full. To the engineer, the glass is exactly twice as big as it
needs to be." --Unknown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAopGXkAS13ByzgbsRAmFIAJ98Z/3cjnaPg1B+qIXy6tPLe5+lVwCff0mT
hCwSCLtoPLLLtAn/LNdLHsQ=
=LpaT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games
Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to
relieve your stress.
http://www.StressedPuppy.com
********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
