Robert Bielik wrote: > Frank Yerrace skrev 2012-10-11 22:02: >> ...Windows has no model for a third player to be involved... > What about the Microsoft Global FX which anyways need to be wrapped by any > APO ? One of those could have had the option to control third party installed > DMOs for instance, and thus it would still be under full control of both > applications (through some WASAPI interface) and the user via sound control > panel. Oh, there are certainly ways this COULD have been implemented. There are a handful of companies that have developed highly tuned microphone array and acoustic echo cancellation algorithms, which would need to be handled as an APO. Microsoft could have architected their AEC and array APOs with a plugin scheme, allowing these companies to continue sell their improved algorithms as a generic product. However, they didn't architect it that way, and as a result that industry is now dead. I've seen 3 or 4 posts this week about "generic audio enhancement". The whole concept seems bogus to me. There's no audio magic that works in every case. I suspect most of these are doing little more than boosting the bass, and you can do that with the built-in controls. > Any important scenario regarding professional audio applications pre-Vista > involves ASIO, and thus has nothing to do with APOs. The APO concept was not introduced until Vista. Prior to that, these things were implemented as audio filter drivers. They almost universally sucked. -- Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. ****************** WDMAUDIODEV addresses: Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx URL to WDMAUDIODEV page: http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/