Re: [tuning-math] Modified best 5-limit geometric list
- From: Gene W Smith <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxx>
- To: tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 02:46:59 -0700
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 02:39:56 -0700 Gene W Smith <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxx>
writes:
> 256/243 (2)^8/(3)^5 quintal (blackwood?)
> [[5, 8, 12], [0, 0, -1]]
Which is better? I called the 7-limit version quintal, but they both
should have the same name.
> 3125/3072 (5)^5/(2)^10/(3) diesic
> [[1, 0, 2], [0, 5, 1]]
Should be magic; I keep copying myself, and never make the change.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/NsdPZD/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/wHYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
tuning-math-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
____________________________________________________________
To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the
website: < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .
Other related posts:
- » Re: [tuning-math] Modified best 5-limit geometric list
