[THIN] Re: wyse vs neoware vs vxd
- From: "Roger Riggins" <Roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:45:18 -0600
The 1200LE can (or will be able to) play some multimedia like mpeg and
audio locally instead of through the session. It's pretty cool. A wyse
tech showed it to me when he came to look at some other issues. I'm not
sure if the software is released yet or not...
Roger Riggins, A+ MCSE CCNA CCA
ACES Systems Engineer
* 319-287-3102
* roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: TheThin [mailto:TheThin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:37 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: wyse vs neoware vs vxd
Not all ICA clients are equal, even though you'd think they would be.
Look to hardware, and OS differences. Using Wyse units we see a variety
of differences with screen response ( I suspect low powered video cards
in older systems). =20
-----Original Message-----
From: John A. Vorchak [mailto:jvorchak@xxxxxxxx]=20
Posted At: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:28 PM
Posted To: TheThin
Conversation: [THIN] Re: wyse vs neoware vs vxd
Subject: [THIN] Re: wyse vs neoware vs vxd
What models and OS's?
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
John A. Vorchak (eMVP)
Vorchak Software
Custom Windows XP Embedded and
Windows NT Embedded Components and Solutions
jvorchak@xxxxxxxx
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On=20
> Behalf Of Rink, Jesse
> Sent: Tuesday, 04 February, 2003 15.53
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] wyse vs neoware vs vxd
>=20
>=20
> Strange thing.
>=20
> I demo'ed eval units from Wyse, Neoware, and VXL. Using the same
=3D=20
> configuration settings on the clients and on my Windows 2000 Citrix
1.8 =3D
> box, the Wyse outperforms the Neoware and VXL, especially with =3D=20
> multimedia. What I don't understand is WHY since all three are using
=3D
> the ICA protocol, shouldn't the performance be almost the same?
Curious =3D
> to know why this is happening. =3D20
> ********************************************
> This Week's Sponsor: triCerat Inc.
> Let triCerat simplify the administration
> of your Terminal Servers.
> http://www.triCerat.com
> ********************************************
>=20
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:=20
> http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
********************************************
This Week's Sponsor: triCerat Inc.
Let triCerat simplify the administration=20
of your Terminal Servers.
http://www.triCerat.com
********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or=20
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
********************************************
This Week's Sponsor: triCerat Inc.
Let triCerat simplify the administration
of your Terminal Servers.
http://www.triCerat.com
********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: Roger Riggins.vcf
-- Desc: Roger Riggins.vcf
********************************************
This Week's Sponsor: triCerat Inc.
Let triCerat simplify the administration
of your Terminal Servers.
http://www.triCerat.com
********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
