Reminds me of this: <http://techrepublic.com.com/i/tr/downloads/home/windows_xp_services_tha t_can_be_disabled.pdf> Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Mangan > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 2:36 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Scalability of VMWare > workstation 5 on PS > > Of course stripping everything possible from the Guest XP > host will help considerably. It is likely that there are > lots of services and drivers you can take out since all they > do is log on to run that one app. If the app will run on an > older OS that will help - even an unpatched XP without any > service packs would be smaller. > > tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:38 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: SPAM-LOW: [THIN] Re: Scalability of VMWare > workstation 5 on PS > > > Tim, > > Thanks for answering the question and avoiding questioning > the question! > > Yes, we have tried everything possible with this app > including AIE, virtual IP/Loopback, Softricity, etc. It is a > very low overhead application that is basically run once, > logs into a call center processing system to re-direct the > phone line and then just sits there while the agent works. > Disk access, RAM, CPU, etc are negligible. The only real > impact will be the base RAM is takes to run the VM itself. It > is currently running on MS Virtual PC on Citrix at this site. > Moving to ESX is the leading option, but it adds a layer of > cost and complexity which is not ideal for this client's > environment. ESX with Virtual Center and V Motion would add > 30K to the project and we are exploring using those same > hardware boxes to simply add more app servers to the farm and > publish M workstation instead. > > Regards, > > Steve Greenberg > Thin Client Computing > 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 > Scottsdale, AZ 85262 > (602) 432-8649 > www.thinclient.net > steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Mangan > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:40 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: SPAM-LOW: Scalability of VMWare > workstation 5 on PS > > Steve, > > I run workstation, as well as GSX and MS Virtual Server in a > lab environment all the time. In your (customer) situation > running a few virtual servers that will be desktop OS's will > be OK - assuming the host has sufficient Memory. I typically > keep 8-10 virtual OSs up on any given box with "reasonable" > performance. If the app itself does a lot of disk access > then disk speed becomes important, but it really is a memory > thing that is most limiting. > > Not optimal, but you said you didn't want to get into that, > and I know that you clearly are familiar with application > virtualization which would be the more obvious alternative choice. > > tim > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 4:56 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: SPAM-LOW: [THIN] Scalability of VMWare workstation 5 on PS > > > Does anyone have any scaling feedback on running VMWare > workstation 5 on PS as a published app serving up XP > desktops? # of sessions per server, etc. > would be helpful > > Please don't respond to debate the merits, this is for a > customer project in which a single app will be run from these > XP instances and it must be done this way!!!! > > thanks > > Steve Greenberg > Thin Client Computing > 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 > Scottsdale, AZ 85262 > (602) 432-8649 > www.thinclient.net > steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > ************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or > Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > ************************************************ > > > > ************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > ************************************************ > > ************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > ************************************************ > > > > ************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > ************************************************ > ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************