Heh, touche'. Actually we're a remote site and the infrastructure is not
that straight forward. My boss is very, uh what's the word, uh frugal. Yeah
that's it
------------------------------
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Jeff Pitsch
*Sent:* Friday, September 15, 2006 4:41 PM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: PS 4.0 and summary database
I have to ask, you can afford to buy PS Enterprise but you don't have a
SQL Server? Especially Steelcase of all companies :)
It may very well work but it would not be supported.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Provision Networks VIP
Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
On 9/15/06, Beckett, William (Bill) <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Would SQL server runtime edition work?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Andrew Wood
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:00 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: PS 4.0 and summary database
>
>
>
> yep, summary database on anything...
>
> needs either MS SQL 7 or 2000 (think they might now allowed latest SQL
> release)
> or
> oracle 8i/9i
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Beckett, William (Bill)
> *Sent:* 14 September 2006 13:31
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] PS 4.0 and summary database
>
>
>
> Just want to verify this…
>
> If no SQL or ORACLE DB is available then you are SOL on the summary
> database? PS 4.0 on W2K3, ENT
>
