[THIN] Re: OT: Exchange AV scanner of choice
- From: "Sullivan, Edward" <Edward.Sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:01:39 -0500
My design at my previous job was a GFI MailEssentials/MailSecurity box in
the DMZ to act as the email screener server, and an Exchange box on the
internal network running Computer Associates eTrust AV for Exchange. GFI
Screener would pass clean email to the Exchange box, all outgoing SMTP was
also funnelled out through the GFI Screener. Not one single virus made it
past this setup in 4 years.
Edward Sullivan
Sr Analyst
Windows Technical Services - West
Cingular Wireless
Office.469.227.2087
_____
From: Nick Smith [mailto:nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 3:53 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [THIN] Re: OT: Exchange AV scanner of choice
GFi's MailSecurity - has the advantage of using up to four different AV
engines, which gives me a warm glow fo confidence that *one* of them will
stop a virus. But I would agree that if volume is becoming too much, then
whatever product you usse should be placed on its own box in front of the
Excahnge.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Jarrett-Norton [mailto:bjarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tue 9/14/2004 2:19 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Exchange AV scanner of choice
Other related posts:
