[THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed
- From: "Tim Anderson" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:56:24 -0500
Secure Access Manager is not a requirement for CSG. You just need an
existing Citrix infrastructure. CSG is not really that complicated of a
solution and the latest version has all the GUI diagnostic utilities that
earlier versions lacked. The CSG is now supported on the same machine as
the Web Interface (WI) and the Secure Ticket Authority can reside on any
machine in the internal network. The CSG/WI box does not need to be a
workhorse so equipment that you are retiring from other uses would likely be
a viable option. Beyond an ICA client ( 6.3 (Intel/Win) or greater that
your clients probably already have...) there is nothing needed on the
client machine. And now to the best part.... CSG costs you nothing... It's
FREE.
Tim Anderson
Senior Engineering Consultant
Server Centric Consulting LLC
11939 Manchester Rd. #110
St. Louis, MO 63131
(888) 747 - 4700
<http://www.servercentric.com/> www.servercentric.com
All electronic mail communications originating from or transmitted to Server
Centric Consulting are subject to monitoring. This message and the
information contained in it, which may consist of electronic data
attachments, are the confidential and proprietary communications of SCC and
are intended to be received only by the individual or individuals to whom
the message has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, please take notice that any use, copying, printing,
forwarding or distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the SCC Privacy Officer at (888) 747-4700 and/or forward the message
to privacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and delete or destroy all copies of this
message.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Armstrong, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:33 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed
Steve,
Thank you for the feedback. What, in your opinion makes CSG a better
option? It seems that the complexity of the setup and the licensing costs
of Secure Access Manager make CSG a hard sell compared to the seemingly
simplistic setup and management of the Netilla solution.
I'm just confused about what will be the best solution now and in the future
(with future releases of Presentation Server).
One thing I really need is a solution that will require the least amount of
client setup and support.
Regards,
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Greenberg [mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:00 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed
Netilla is a great standalone platform if you are using Terminal Server,
internal Web apps or needs an SSL VPN. However, if you already have Citrix,
Citrix Secure Gateway is a better match.
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Armstrong, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 5:22 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed
Greetings,
I'm writing to see if anyone has experience with the Netilla SSL VPN
appliance in accessing Citrix publications from the internet. Please let me
know what your opinions are on this product. Any information will be
greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Robert Armstrong
Manager of Information Technology
Invesmart, Inc.
4550 Lena Drive, Suite 201
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
p: (717) 591-8900 x132
f: (717) 591-9822
e-mail: <mailto:robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action
based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
_____
_____
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action
based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
_____
Other related posts:
