[THIN] Re: Monitoring Citrix With Servers Alive
- From: Mark Guzzo <marguz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 03:20:13 -0500
My director at work uses WhatsUp Gold and I use Nagios. Seems that Nagios will
pick up on the outage quicker. I monitor 1494, host, and pub applications.
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:36:33 -0400
"Greg Reese" <GReese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I am not sure how many of you are using Servers Alive to monitor your =
> servers but I think anyone could shed some light on this.
>
> When setting up the checks for my Citrix servers, is it preferable to =
> have it monitor port 1494, the IMA Service, or both. Or does it matter?
>
> Just curious. I am moving Servers Alive to a different server and I am =
> re-evaluating the checks I have it making.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Greg
> ***********************************************
> This weeks sponsor Emergent Online
> http://www.go-eol.com
> Visit Jim Kenzig of thethin.net at the
> Emergent Online Booth #221 at Citrix Iforum 2002!
> Register now at:
> http://www.citrixiforum.com/registerNow.html
> ***********************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
>
> http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
--- :-) ---
Mark Guzzo
Sair LCA, LCP
***********************************************
This weeks sponsor Emergent Online
http://www.go-eol.com
Visit Jim Kenzig of thethin.net at the
Emergent Online Booth #221 at Citrix Iforum 2002!
Register now at:
http://www.citrixiforum.com/registerNow.html
***********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
