[THIN] Re: [FG-SPAM] RE: Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices

  • From: "Roger Riggins" <roger.riggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:25:13 -0500

If this email is not spam, click here to submit the signatures to
FortiGuard - AntiSpam Service. 

I agree; plus local printers just don't make sense to me from a
cost/management perspective.

 

Roger Riggins   
Network Administrator 
Lutheran Services in Iowa 
w: 319.859.3543 
c: 319.290.5687 
http://www.lsiowa.org 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stanley Watts
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 7:32 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] [FG-SPAM] RE: Re: Recommendations for Thin client
devices

 

Personally I find the network printers easier to use. We can control
which drivers are used at the queue and then create mappings by
clientname to each printer. 

 

 

Other related posts: