[THIN] Re: Cisco ASA vs Netscaler
- From: "Steve Greenberg" <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:16:09 -0700
We have issues with ASA during a large Citrix implementation related to it's
active/passive failover features. The client had two entry points with ASA's
as the firewall and experienced some inconsistencies with failing between
them that caused access issues to the CTX farm.
What roles/features do you want to assign to the ASA exactly in relation to
the Citrix farm (firewall, load balancing, etc.) ?
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85266
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of msemon@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:36 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Cisco ASA vs Netscaler
Is anyone using Cisco ASA to deliver Citrix applications and if so does it
scale well?
Also, has anyone done a comparison between the Netscaler and ASA? The
reason we are looking at this is because the CAG might not work with our
Cicso NAC implementation.
Thanks,
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
myhosting.com - Premium MicrosoftR WindowsR and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
