The Daily Shot - 12/10/14

  • From: "The Daily Shot" <thedailyshotletter@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thedailyshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:09:49 -0500

The Daily Shot™

 

Greetings,

 

We start with Japan, where household confidence fell back to levels we saw at 
the time of the consumption tax hike. 

 



 

As discussed before, the Bank of Japan is accelerating its bond purchases as it 
tries to blunt the negative impact of the new taxes. The slope of the JGB 
holdings (below) is turning higher.

 

BoJ holdings of JGBs



Source: BOJ

 

As a result, the 10 yr JGB yield is now at 40bp as BOJ buys up the supply. Some 
are speculating that the BOJ will ultimately undertake some form of 
monetization – effectively agreeing to roll existing debt in perpetuity.

 



Source: Investing.com

  _____  

 

In the Eurozone, the 10 yr Bund yield fell below 68bp – another low. In 
addition to the deflationary pressures and renewed concerns about Greece, this 
is a bet on QE. Many believe that the demand for second offering of TLTRO 
(cheap 4-year loans from the ECB) will be weak, forcing ECB into outright 
securities purchases (probably the only way it can increase its balance sheet 
substantially). We will know about the demand tomorrow.

 



Source: Investing.com

 

In another Eurozone development, French payrolls are declining again – which 
will put further pressure on the ECB to act more forcefully. Once again a 
central bank will be asked to solve structural problems in the economy with a 
blunt instrument. 

 



  _____  

 

Ukrainian 3-yr dollar-denominated bond yield jumped above 25%, as the IMF now 
expects a $15bn government funding gap. There is a restructuring on the way 
here – the hole is way too big for Ukraine to plug on its own.

 



Source: @Schuldensuehner

  _____  

 

Speaking of restructuring, Argentina remains on an unsustainable path. Having 
defaulted on dollar bonds and with no access to hard currency, the nation is 
the next Zimbabwe.




 

And for those who like volatility, this is the market for you:

 



Source: Investing.com

  _____  

 

Now we return to everyone’s favorite topic: energy. Here are some developments:

 

1. WTI is now below $62 and Brent below $65.

 

2. Apparently a bunch of funds went long oil right after the mini-crash in 
October and are now unwinding.

 



Source: @tracyalloway

 

3. A slowdown in Texas economy looms – what will be the impact on the US?

 



Source: @ac_eco, @EconBrothers

 

4. Energy projects in Canada, US, Brazil, Mexico are at risk (source: FT). So 
go ahead, buy that overpriced house in Calgary – all is well.



Source: @FT

  _____  

 

In the United States the yield on the one-year treasury bills rose sharply. The 
Treasury issued 1-yr bills on Tuesday with more supply than the market was 
ready to absorb immediately. Other money market rates rose as well.

 



Source: Investing.com

 

Part of the issue is the Fed’s experimental rate normalization programs. The 
Fed increased rates on the reverse repo program and continues with the term 
deposit facility. These offerings have been “crowding out” treasury bills. In 
that sense the rate increase experiment has worked.

  _____  

 

In credit-land pressure on leveraged finance assets remains. Here are some 
traded US corporate credit products: blue=loans, green=HY bonds, red=BDCs 

 



 

MLPs took a hit as well.

 



Source: Investing.com

 

Through November, the US CLO market has been doing quite well. Collateral 
accumulation is less difficult now as prices for many leveraged loans are below 
par. It will be interesting to see what the impending downgrades on energy 
names will do to the CLO world (how big will the CCC baskets get?).

 



Source: @TRLPC

  _____  

 

Yesterday I included the chart below from Merrill Lynch of aggregate (index) 
muni yield curve. Apparently the yield curve does not incorporate the call 
schedule of muni bonds.

 



 

I got the following response on this:

 

I am surprised at your opinion on municipal bonds.  The curve you published 
uses very poor math and is a terrible comparison.  I agree that through the 
first ten years of maturities municipals have somewhat corrected, though the 
curve you use is based on a fixed 5% coupon, so the durations are a bit shorter 
than the “par” treasury curve you use.  Furthermore, and more upsetting to me 
is the fact that you seem to have fallen into the “muni index trap of bad math” 
for long dated bonds.  The “thirty year” index you use is based on a 5% coupon 
with a 10 year call.  With yields at <3% the effective duration on these bonds 
is closer to the duration of the ten year treasury than it is of the thirty 
year treasury. 

 

To clarify, the state of Texas recently sold Aaa/AAA/AAA bonds with a final 
maturity of 2044, and a call date of 2024.  The bonds are an excellent 
representative of the triple A muni market.  The yield is currently 3.05% in 
the market, but that is yield to call, with an effective duration of about 11.5 
years. As you know the yield point for a treasury with an 11.5 year duration is 
about 2.5%.  The yield to maturity of the Texas bonds is above 4%.  It is not 
good math to compare 30 year non-call treasury yields with municipals that are 
priced to a ten year call.  I realize you have used a method of analysis 
popular in the retail market , but institutions use effective duration for 
municipals and arbitrageurs that break down the math see municipal as very 
cheap.  Below is a graph that is more accurate, comparing the yield to maturity 
of the Bond Buyer municipal index to the 30 year treasury in the form of a 
ratio:

 



 

Best,

 

Jon Fiebach

CIO / Co-CEO



  _____  

 

Now some food for thought. Hong Kong protesters' message to the government:

 



Source: @SCMP_News

  _____  

 

Thanks for reading the Daily Shot. To subscribe or unsubscribe please enter 
your e-mail address here:  <//www.freelists.org/list/thedailyshot> 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe to the Daily Shot and select the appropriate command. 
E-mail addresses are NEVER shared with anyone.

 

Note: If you have received the Daily Shot in error please notify me by replying 
or simply unsubscribe per instructions above.

 

Note:  Please, do not send comments to  <mailto:thedailyshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
thedailyshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx in hopes they will be sent to the full distribution 
list. They won’t. This is a newsletter, not a discussion group. If you have a 
comment, please just reply.

 

All content provided by the Daily Shot is for informational and educational 
purposes only and is not meant to represent trade or investment 
recommendations. The Daily Shot is not produced by any entity that is 
registered as an investment adviser with any federal or state regulatory 
agency. 

 

CONTENT COPYRIGHT 2014. The Daily Shot.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

 

JPEG image

JPEG image

PNG image

PNG image

PNG image

JPEG image

PNG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image

PNG image

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  • » The Daily Shot - 12/10/14 - The Daily Shot