The Daily Shot™ Greetings, We start with Japan, where household confidence fell back to levels we saw at the time of the consumption tax hike. As discussed before, the Bank of Japan is accelerating its bond purchases as it tries to blunt the negative impact of the new taxes. The slope of the JGB holdings (below) is turning higher. BoJ holdings of JGBs Source: BOJ As a result, the 10 yr JGB yield is now at 40bp as BOJ buys up the supply. Some are speculating that the BOJ will ultimately undertake some form of monetization – effectively agreeing to roll existing debt in perpetuity. Source: Investing.com _____ In the Eurozone, the 10 yr Bund yield fell below 68bp – another low. In addition to the deflationary pressures and renewed concerns about Greece, this is a bet on QE. Many believe that the demand for second offering of TLTRO (cheap 4-year loans from the ECB) will be weak, forcing ECB into outright securities purchases (probably the only way it can increase its balance sheet substantially). We will know about the demand tomorrow. Source: Investing.com In another Eurozone development, French payrolls are declining again – which will put further pressure on the ECB to act more forcefully. Once again a central bank will be asked to solve structural problems in the economy with a blunt instrument. _____ Ukrainian 3-yr dollar-denominated bond yield jumped above 25%, as the IMF now expects a $15bn government funding gap. There is a restructuring on the way here – the hole is way too big for Ukraine to plug on its own. Source: @Schuldensuehner _____ Speaking of restructuring, Argentina remains on an unsustainable path. Having defaulted on dollar bonds and with no access to hard currency, the nation is the next Zimbabwe. And for those who like volatility, this is the market for you: Source: Investing.com _____ Now we return to everyone’s favorite topic: energy. Here are some developments: 1. WTI is now below $62 and Brent below $65. 2. Apparently a bunch of funds went long oil right after the mini-crash in October and are now unwinding. Source: @tracyalloway 3. A slowdown in Texas economy looms – what will be the impact on the US? Source: @ac_eco, @EconBrothers 4. Energy projects in Canada, US, Brazil, Mexico are at risk (source: FT). So go ahead, buy that overpriced house in Calgary – all is well. Source: @FT _____ In the United States the yield on the one-year treasury bills rose sharply. The Treasury issued 1-yr bills on Tuesday with more supply than the market was ready to absorb immediately. Other money market rates rose as well. Source: Investing.com Part of the issue is the Fed’s experimental rate normalization programs. The Fed increased rates on the reverse repo program and continues with the term deposit facility. These offerings have been “crowding out” treasury bills. In that sense the rate increase experiment has worked. _____ In credit-land pressure on leveraged finance assets remains. Here are some traded US corporate credit products: blue=loans, green=HY bonds, red=BDCs MLPs took a hit as well. Source: Investing.com Through November, the US CLO market has been doing quite well. Collateral accumulation is less difficult now as prices for many leveraged loans are below par. It will be interesting to see what the impending downgrades on energy names will do to the CLO world (how big will the CCC baskets get?). Source: @TRLPC _____ Yesterday I included the chart below from Merrill Lynch of aggregate (index) muni yield curve. Apparently the yield curve does not incorporate the call schedule of muni bonds. I got the following response on this: I am surprised at your opinion on municipal bonds. The curve you published uses very poor math and is a terrible comparison. I agree that through the first ten years of maturities municipals have somewhat corrected, though the curve you use is based on a fixed 5% coupon, so the durations are a bit shorter than the “par” treasury curve you use. Furthermore, and more upsetting to me is the fact that you seem to have fallen into the “muni index trap of bad math” for long dated bonds. The “thirty year” index you use is based on a 5% coupon with a 10 year call. With yields at <3% the effective duration on these bonds is closer to the duration of the ten year treasury than it is of the thirty year treasury. To clarify, the state of Texas recently sold Aaa/AAA/AAA bonds with a final maturity of 2044, and a call date of 2024. The bonds are an excellent representative of the triple A muni market. The yield is currently 3.05% in the market, but that is yield to call, with an effective duration of about 11.5 years. As you know the yield point for a treasury with an 11.5 year duration is about 2.5%. The yield to maturity of the Texas bonds is above 4%. It is not good math to compare 30 year non-call treasury yields with municipals that are priced to a ten year call. I realize you have used a method of analysis popular in the retail market , but institutions use effective duration for municipals and arbitrageurs that break down the math see municipal as very cheap. Below is a graph that is more accurate, comparing the yield to maturity of the Bond Buyer municipal index to the 30 year treasury in the form of a ratio: Best, Jon Fiebach CIO / Co-CEO _____ Now some food for thought. Hong Kong protesters' message to the government: Source: @SCMP_News _____ Thanks for reading the Daily Shot. To subscribe or unsubscribe please enter your e-mail address here: <//www.freelists.org/list/thedailyshot> Subscribe/Unsubscribe to the Daily Shot and select the appropriate command. E-mail addresses are NEVER shared with anyone. Note: If you have received the Daily Shot in error please notify me by replying or simply unsubscribe per instructions above. Note: Please, do not send comments to <mailto:thedailyshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> thedailyshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx in hopes they will be sent to the full distribution list. They won’t. This is a newsletter, not a discussion group. If you have a comment, please just reply. All content provided by the Daily Shot is for informational and educational purposes only and is not meant to represent trade or investment recommendations. The Daily Shot is not produced by any entity that is registered as an investment adviser with any federal or state regulatory agency. CONTENT COPYRIGHT 2014. The Daily Shot. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED