[sprdlinux] RE: 虽然各持己见，但争论得依然彬彬有礼，真真的是和谐社区啊
- From: Zhizhou Zhang (张治洲) <Zhizhou.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "sprdlinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sprdlinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:10:34 +0000
为什么不CC sprdlinux一份呢？让我瞻仰下大牛风采啊
--
Zhizhou
________________________________
From: sprdlinux-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <sprdlinux-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Chunyan Zhang (张春艳) <Chunyan.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 5:01 PM
To: sprdlinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sprdlinux] 虽然各持己见，但争论得依然彬彬有礼，真真的是和谐社区啊
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 22:21:30 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Yes, we *can* move it in kirkwood.dtsi, but IMHO we *should* keep it in
> > the board files. I see the "chosen" node and its properties as _the_
> > board node.
> >
> > One could argue then, that we should count the memory properties too and
> > put the most common in the SoC dtsi. But you are right, as UART0 is also
> > the UART with boot support, it is likely to be always connected to
> > a more-or-less accessible console output.
> >
> > I really have no strong opinion about it.
>
> Me neithe, but the advantage of putting it in kirkwood.dtsi is that it
> then does not get forgotten, and is always there for bearbox to use.
I would prefer having it in the board.dts file out of principle, but I
agree it's not very important either way.
Arnd
--
Kind regards
Chunyan
<http://www.spreadtrum.com/>
Other related posts:
