[sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Inside Orlando’s first machine gun theme park

  • From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:15:59 -0500

OK, then we should try the woman for murder.

Also "freedom" of divorce in todays courts means absolute freedom from a
contract made.

It is the only place a contract can be ended one sided.

Killing an unborn child isn't controlling?

Boy, have you been brainwashed.

DR
 On Feb 12, 2015 9:56 AM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> DR,
> Nobody should be able to force a woman to give birth to a child if she
> doesn't want to.
>
> Having to pay child support and not being allowed to see the child is a
> case of making a bad choice in a mate and/or of having made other bad
> choices.
>
> If you want to force a woman to bear a child then you want control over
> her life and are no different than a communist.
>
> If you want to deny a woman the freedom of divorce, for any reason, then
> you are no different than a communist.
>
> The man you describe is called a "controlling personality".
>
> Many things in life we simply have no control over. We have no control
> over other people, unless we force them at the point of a gun and that kind
> of control is only temporary. The best we can do is live our lives
> according to our own moral principles. We cannot force our moral principles
> on others. Nor should we be surprised when others do not share our moral
> principles, even though we may have been taught them since early childhood.
> To think that our moral principles are superior to those of other peoples,
> races and religions is nothing but arrogance and ignorance on our part and
> can only lead to disappointment and conflict.
>
> -RR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr."
> Sent: Feb 11, 2015 2:01 PM
> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re:
> [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee]
> Inside Orlando’s first machine gun theme park
>
> Comrade,
>
> Its all about control.
>
> A married couple is having a new baby, wife decides she does not want the
> child, she can abort the child, the father of the child has no say, and
> cannot protect his unborn child.
>
> If insteadvof aborting the child, the above wife wants a divorce, even
> though both are under a contract, the husband can not defend himsrlf under
> no fault divorce.  If husband does not want the child he will still pay.
> If husband insists on joint custody, wif3 knows what to do, say she is
> afraid of husband, she gets a restraining order based on fear even though
> she was never threatened or abused.  Husband has that for the rest of his
> life:  It is a civil order that appears on his criminal record.
>
> It is all about control.
>
> Those are some very big reasons I say NO to communism.
>
> 73
>
> DR
>  On Feb 11, 2015 2:00 PM, "Redacted sender sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" <
> dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> David
>> Wowee, from one single shooting amusement park you have expanded it to a
>> multiple bunch of issues I haven't the
>> time to respond to each one. It is not up to you to say what the commies
>> want, you are no expert in my humble socialist
>> opinion. Gun safety like trigger locks is different from gun control like
>> age limitations on ownership.  No fault divorces is
>> first I hear about? Divorces is divorces friendly or not friendly is all
>> I know? Abortions is very complicated depending
>> on many circumstances which I thought was already decided after much
>> investigations, discussions, etc. Abortions don't fit
>> all circumstances and you yourself once wrote that it is not up to us men
>> to force our decisions on wimen on this matter?
>> To much for me to comment on all the other stuff you brought up.
>>
>> Regards
>> Stanley
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
>> To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tue, Feb 10, 2015 7:54 am
>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re:
>> [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Inside Orlando’s first machine gun theme
>> park
>>
>>         Stan,
>>
>>  It isn't about gun safety.  It's about gun control.  One thing that the
>> commies want is no one to be able to defend themselves.
>>
>>  If you got rid of the #1 thing that is causing school shootings, it
>> would help.
>>
>>  Get rid of no fault divorces and abortions.
>>
>>  That's another form of people control resulting in millins of fatherless
>> children.
>>
>>  Have you noticed that all the boys who were involved in school shootings
>> were children of divorce.  The fellow who was in the Marshfield, MA plan to
>> shoot up the school actually turned in the ones who had weapons thinking
>> he'd be doing the right thing.
>>
>>  Wrong.  The police used him as a scapegoat.  He went to jail for the
>> longest time.  Some say it's because the local police wanted to punish his
>> father who is president of the Boston patrolman's union.
>>
>> http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2006/05/the-lost-boys-1/
>>
>>  No Fault Divorce, Abortion, Restraining Orders are all part of "new law"
>> where you cannot protect your family.  If your wife says she is "afraid" of
>> you, even though you have not raised your voice, or your hand towards her,
>> if your wife doesn't want to co-parent anymore, she can just divorce you
>> and get complete control of the children, and by law you cannot defend
>> yourself against no-fault divorce.  If you get a restraining order based on
>> fear even though they're not supposed to be issued for just that, you can
>> never remove it from your criminal record, which means you cannot do even
>> volunteer work.
>>
>>  Not that some Republicans aren't much better, but the TeaParty
>> Republicans are - at least as a diverse group from all races, all sexes:
>> They don't want this crap.  I'm with them.
>>
>>  Men (especially because the war is against them) should be able to
>> defend themselves.  Attorneys that lie, police that lie should go to jail.
>>
>>  If you've ever encountered a moment when the whole system works to hurt
>> you and your family, you know how much they can do.
>>
>>  When the court keeps the records and the records are your proof that
>> they're lying, those records can be changed.
>>
>>  It does not stop.  The police won't investigate these crimes - because
>> they're part of them.
>>
>> 73
>>  DR
>>
>

Other related posts: