OK, then we should try the woman for murder. Also "freedom" of divorce in todays courts means absolute freedom from a contract made. It is the only place a contract can be ended one sided. Killing an unborn child isn't controlling? Boy, have you been brainwashed. DR On Feb 12, 2015 9:56 AM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > DR, > Nobody should be able to force a woman to give birth to a child if she > doesn't want to. > > Having to pay child support and not being allowed to see the child is a > case of making a bad choice in a mate and/or of having made other bad > choices. > > If you want to force a woman to bear a child then you want control over > her life and are no different than a communist. > > If you want to deny a woman the freedom of divorce, for any reason, then > you are no different than a communist. > > The man you describe is called a "controlling personality". > > Many things in life we simply have no control over. We have no control > over other people, unless we force them at the point of a gun and that kind > of control is only temporary. The best we can do is live our lives > according to our own moral principles. We cannot force our moral principles > on others. Nor should we be surprised when others do not share our moral > principles, even though we may have been taught them since early childhood. > To think that our moral principles are superior to those of other peoples, > races and religions is nothing but arrogance and ignorance on our part and > can only lead to disappointment and conflict. > > -RR > > -----Original Message----- > From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." > Sent: Feb 11, 2015 2:01 PM > To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: > [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] > Inside Orlando’s first machine gun theme park > > Comrade, > > Its all about control. > > A married couple is having a new baby, wife decides she does not want the > child, she can abort the child, the father of the child has no say, and > cannot protect his unborn child. > > If insteadvof aborting the child, the above wife wants a divorce, even > though both are under a contract, the husband can not defend himsrlf under > no fault divorce. If husband does not want the child he will still pay. > If husband insists on joint custody, wif3 knows what to do, say she is > afraid of husband, she gets a restraining order based on fear even though > she was never threatened or abused. Husband has that for the rest of his > life: It is a civil order that appears on his criminal record. > > It is all about control. > > Those are some very big reasons I say NO to communism. > > 73 > > DR > On Feb 11, 2015 2:00 PM, "Redacted sender sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" < > dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> David >> Wowee, from one single shooting amusement park you have expanded it to a >> multiple bunch of issues I haven't the >> time to respond to each one. It is not up to you to say what the commies >> want, you are no expert in my humble socialist >> opinion. Gun safety like trigger locks is different from gun control like >> age limitations on ownership. No fault divorces is >> first I hear about? Divorces is divorces friendly or not friendly is all >> I know? Abortions is very complicated depending >> on many circumstances which I thought was already decided after much >> investigations, discussions, etc. Abortions don't fit >> all circumstances and you yourself once wrote that it is not up to us men >> to force our decisions on wimen on this matter? >> To much for me to comment on all the other stuff you brought up. >> >> Regards >> Stanley >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> >> To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Tue, Feb 10, 2015 7:54 am >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Re: >> [sparkscoffee] Re: [sparkscoffee] Inside Orlando’s first machine gun theme >> park >> >> Stan, >> >> It isn't about gun safety. It's about gun control. One thing that the >> commies want is no one to be able to defend themselves. >> >> If you got rid of the #1 thing that is causing school shootings, it >> would help. >> >> Get rid of no fault divorces and abortions. >> >> That's another form of people control resulting in millins of fatherless >> children. >> >> Have you noticed that all the boys who were involved in school shootings >> were children of divorce. The fellow who was in the Marshfield, MA plan to >> shoot up the school actually turned in the ones who had weapons thinking >> he'd be doing the right thing. >> >> Wrong. The police used him as a scapegoat. He went to jail for the >> longest time. Some say it's because the local police wanted to punish his >> father who is president of the Boston patrolman's union. >> >> http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2006/05/the-lost-boys-1/ >> >> No Fault Divorce, Abortion, Restraining Orders are all part of "new law" >> where you cannot protect your family. If your wife says she is "afraid" of >> you, even though you have not raised your voice, or your hand towards her, >> if your wife doesn't want to co-parent anymore, she can just divorce you >> and get complete control of the children, and by law you cannot defend >> yourself against no-fault divorce. If you get a restraining order based on >> fear even though they're not supposed to be issued for just that, you can >> never remove it from your criminal record, which means you cannot do even >> volunteer work. >> >> Not that some Republicans aren't much better, but the TeaParty >> Republicans are - at least as a diverse group from all races, all sexes: >> They don't want this crap. I'm with them. >> >> Men (especially because the war is against them) should be able to >> defend themselves. Attorneys that lie, police that lie should go to jail. >> >> If you've ever encountered a moment when the whole system works to hurt >> you and your family, you know how much they can do. >> >> When the court keeps the records and the records are your proof that >> they're lying, those records can be changed. >> >> It does not stop. The police won't investigate these crimes - because >> they're part of them. >> >> 73 >> DR >> >