[SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without recei ver access
- From: "Beal, Weston" <weston_beal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:48:53 -0700
Brian,
You've gotten yourself into a tight spot here. I guess your parts are BGAs so
you can't contact the actual pin, right? The next best thing, but clearly not
ideal, is to probe at the nearest via and compare that measurement to the
simulated waveform at that via. If those waveforms compare very well then you
have good confidence in you simulations and can use the simulation results to
get waveforms that you would never be able to measure anyway.
Regards,
Weston
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of arsenault, brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 8:02 AM
To: 'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [SI-LIST] Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
Folks...
I'm looking for some suggestions and ideas on how to perform SI measurements
and correlate them to simulations when you don't have access to the receiver
pin.
For example, one of our designs is looking at back-to-back mounting of DDR-2
memory chips, and based on the spacing of the board, the vias close to the
receivers (the RAM's, when a read operation takes place) will not be
accessible. The same thing would apply to probing signals at a receiver that
is using blind and buried vias.
Traditionally, all of our technology has utilized only through-vias, and we
have been able to probe directly on the pins of the receivers if a via was not
located very close by. As we're moving forward, it's apparent that we need to
find a better way to both show the designer that his/her design will work, and
for the SI group to correlate their simulations to measurements.
I'm aware that building a test card to validate the buffers is one way to go,
but in these times, we are trying to minimize extra costs.
Thanks...
Brian
Brian Arsenault
Principal HW Engineer
EMC Corporation
Hopkinton, MA
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without recei ver access
