interestingly we found that a serial 9-pin connector was floating i.e., it was not connected to ground. When we connected it to ground we got like ~7db margin below class A. Then we removed that connector (we dont need that for production), radiated emissions become worse ..less than 1 db from Class A limit. then we removed RS232 IC which was feeding signal to that connector (thought that lines may be acting as antenna)..it become more worse...> 3 db from Class A limit .. Anybody has clue why it is happening... also on separate experiement we changed termination scheme from series (33 ohm) to parallel (50 ohm to ground) at load..we supress 800MHz but 900MHz failed test...any idea why ? as parallel termination draws enormous amount of current so we try 100 ohm to Vcc and 100 ohm to ground termination at load..it matches 50 ohm transmission line but results at 800Mhz are worse... -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bashir, Shiraz (MED) Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:37 AM To: 'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: [SI-LIST] 800MHz Radiated Emissions Hi, We are using a MPC9448 Clock Fanout buffer (1:12) whose input is 100MHz +/- 50 ppm from a crystal osc. - 8 x outputs of clock fanout buffer are going to 8 x SDRAMs. - 9th output is going to microprocessor. -10th ouput is going to 74LVCX74 to get 25Mhz output for LVDS105 (whose one output goes to Ethernet Switch and same ouput goes to Ethernet Transceiver) -Last two outputs are Not Connected When we ran Radiated Emissions test for Class A compliance we saw 800, 900 MHz freq above Class A limits. Using near field probe we found that Emissions is coming from clock fanout buffer and at front of device where there was a wide slot. By adding more 'aggressive' decoupling caps .001, 1 & .1 uF & "simulated" slots using copper braids on old enclosure, we pass class A limits. We designed new board & casing adding above mentioned changes, ran the test again. all freq are well below Class A, only 800 MHz is like 2-3 dbs above Class A limits. Old board and old enclosure with decoupling modifications and simulated slots shows 800Mhz having 14 db less than Class A. But when we put new board in old enclosure we see loss of 9 dbs at 800Mhz freq. Does somebody have any idea why it is happening ? What electrical characteristics should I be looking at MPC9448 Clock Fanout buffer while calculating its decoupling requirements. Note: it is a 12 layer board. Thanks, Shiraz Bashir ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu