Somebody wrote that we shouldn’t have to google the names, that the biographies
should be included and sufficient (or word to that effect that I expanded :-)
However, beyond the biographies there could be more relevant information and I
like to see beyond what a campaigner says about him/herself to what may be out
there to discover. It’s a cat’s curiosity. :-)
Working on more judges that judge other breeds thanks to those who have added
to my list.
Stormy
On Sep 4, 2016, at 8:09 PM, Stormy V. Hope <Stormy435@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I received only a few and I’ve been told by more that it’s too late… that
most have already made their choices and sent in their ballots. So maybe we
can start earlier next year.
I did notice some names that I’ve never seen before. It’s interesting to see
the working dog people taking an interest in our board…. and so many of them!
I will just remind you all to google the names, check them out that way.
Since I do a lot of name research into the people who are behind seizure and
nefarious legislation goals, I’ve learned to really dig deep lately!!!
And Stay Positive! I have always thought a positive attitude is better for
the digestion (barbecue, too??? LOL) and a good night’s sleep!
Stormy NOT as an Admin!!!!
On Sep 4, 2016, at 5:42 PM, edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Are we giving Stormy questions to present to the BOD nominees? I May have
missed that memo... If so I have only one question! " Dear nominee in light
of the decision to return the Reno National to St Louis until the world
ends, will you make a motion to vacate the decision of the 2017 St Louis
National to return it to a suitable west region site! ...how's that! RB
Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App
