[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Sanatorum

  • From: Pinehillgsds@xxxxxxx
  • To: Stormy435@xxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:16:52 EDT

 
 
Stormy,
 
I went to the PA Federation's web site and also googled it and I can't find  
anywhere were it specifies if it was live or read into the record.  It  almost 
sounds like it was live because the text reflects the president of the  
Senate saying "Mr. Santorum" and immediately following the text begins "Mr.  
President".....I'm trying to remember from studying this stuff in grade school  
if 
the same language is used when prepared text is read into the record, and I  
honestly don't know.  Maybe a history buff can tell us:)  
 
***********************************
 
In a message dated 8/1/2005 4:59:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
Stormy435@xxxxxxx writes:
Many  listers were enroute, or not at their computers, when Kathy posted Sen. 
 
Sanatorum's complete remarks. I am assuming these were read into the  record, 
not live to the Senate???   Somebody???   You  will notice that he (or his 
staff 
:-(,    is addressing the  concerns of all of us, and putting these remarks 
on 
record just before the  Senate recess.   I don't see that he has addressed 
the 
fact that  as co-sponsors he has an organization that was named before a 
senate  committee as a supporter of   domestic terrorist groups, and IT's  
supporter.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The following e-mail from the PA Fed.  of Dog  Clubs:
**********************************************************

These  remarks by Senator Santorum encourage us to believe that he is   
hearing
the concerns that many people have expressed.  We expect the  AKC to  continue
to have an influence on the progress of this  legislation.


SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT ON PAWS
Mr.  SANTORUM.  Mr. President,  on May 26, 2005 I introduced with my  
colleague
Senator Durbin the â??Pet Animal  Welfare Statuteâ?? of 2005, or  â??PAWS.â??   
PAWS
amends the Animal Welfare Act to strengthen the  Secretary of  Agricultureâ??s
authority to deal with the problems of  substandard animal  dealers.
I want to make clear to our colleagues  and the public that we believe the 
vast majority of animal dealers  are conscientious persons who make every 
effort 
to treat their  animals humanely and to comply with the law.  But,
unfortunately,  there are some  animal dealers who do not care properly for 
their  animals
and who seek to profit  at the expense of the animals and the  public.  They
exploit the weaknesses and  loopholes in the  current law to evade or ignore
basic standards for the care and   condition of animals.  These  substandard
dealers give the entire  pet industry a black eye, all the while  preying 
upon  
the
public.  It is  these unscrupulous animal dealers at  which PAWS is targeted.
PAWS strengthens the Secretary of Agricultureâ??s  authority to deal with 
substandard animal dealers by making four  important improvements to the 
Animal 
Welfare Act.  First, it  will bring  under coverage of the Animal Welfare Act 
high
volume  dealers who are in every  respect like those dealers  currently
regulated, but are evading regulation  because they sell  animals exclusively 
at retai
l.  PAWS will continue to exempt real  retail  pet stores, and will add a new
exemption for small dealers and  hobby and show  breeders.  Second, PAWS will
help  the  Secretary of Agriculture identify persons not complying with the  
law
by  requiring those who acquire animals for resale to keep  records of the
source  from whom the animals are acquired and make  these records available 
to the 
Secretary upon request.   Third, PAWS  will create an incentive for dealers to
quickly correct  serious problems by  giving the Secretary authority to
temporarily  suspend dealersâ?? licenses for up  to 60 days if a violation is  
placing
the health of an animal in imminent  danger.   Finally, PAWS will  strengthen
the authority of the Secretary to  obtain injunctions to shut down  dealers 
who
fail to comply with  the law.  
The marketplace for animals has changed dramatically  since the 1970s when 
the current animal dealer provisions of the Act  were written.  At that time 
only
retail pet stores and  small  hobby and show breeders sold pet animals, so
regulating wholesale  sellers  and exempting persons who sold animals at 
retail
and were  regulated by the  market made some sense.  With the  advent of  the
Internet, mass national marketing channels, and mass importation   of puppies 
for
resale, there are a large number of unregulated dealers  who are  in every
respect identical to the dealers regulated by the  Act, except that they  
evade
regulation by selling exclusively at  retail.  By regulating these high volume
retail  sellers, we will  assure that they meet the same standards for the 
humane
care  and  treatment of animals that breeders and brokers selling at  
wholesale
have  been meeting for 30 years.
PAWS defines the term  â??retail pet storeâ?? so that only real retail pet 
stores are exempt,  where customers can see the animals and the conditions 
where 
they  are kept.  PAWS also adds a  specific exemption for small dealers  and 
hobby
and show breeders.  Only persons who sell more than 25  dogs  per year would
be regulated.  In  addition, breeders  who sell dogs and cats from fewer than 
7
litters a year bred  or  raised on their own premises, or fewer than 25 dogs
and cats per year bred  or  raised on their own premises, which ever is 
greater,
would be  exempt.  For example, if an Irish Setter breeder has 6  litters  
that
average 6 puppies each for a total of 36 puppies, they can sell   them without
being regulated.  If a  toy breeder has 10 litters  that average only 2 
puppies
each for a total of 20  puppies, they  can sell them without being regulated. 
These breeders could also sell  25  or fewer other dogs a year not bred or
raised on their own  premises such as stud  puppies or puppies from  
co-ownerships,
without being regulated.  I firmly believe that the  sport and  hobby of
breeding and raising dogs and cats should not be a  federally regulated  
activity. 
PAWS will, for the  first  time, put an explicit exemption into the Animal
Welfare Act to  protect small  hobby and show breeders from regulation.
Some persons  who sell dogs for hunting purposes have expressed a concern 
that PAWS  will bring them under regulation.  The current Animal Welfare  Act
already  covers persons who sell hunting dogs, and has for almost  30 years.  
They
are regulated on the same basis as  those who  sell dogs for pets.  PAWS  will
continue to regulate sellers of  hunting dogs on the same basis as those who 
sell dogs as pets.   Only high volume  sellers who exceed the exemptions set
forth in PAWS  will be subject to  regulation.
Some rescue and shelter organizations  have expressed concern that because 
they often charge an adoption fee  to those who adopt the dogs they place, 
these 
organizations will  fall within the definition of â??dealersâ?? in PAWS and  be 
regulated.  True rescue and shelter  organizations who  do not sell dogs or 
cats
in commerce, for profit, will not be   brought under regulation by PAWS,
whether or not they are formally  incorporated  as not for profit 
organizations. 
Some high  volume dealers in cats and dogs who will be brought under  coverage
of  the Animal Welfare Act by PAWS, but who are still small enough that   they
breed and raise dogs or cats in essentially a residential environment,  have 
expressed concern that they will be forced to build kennels and  catteries 
and 
will no longer be able to raise animals in a  residential environment.  There
is nothing in PAWS, or in the   current Animal Welfare Act, that precludes
persons from breeding and  raising  animals in a residential setting, 
provided 
the
animals  are properly housed and  cared for.  In implementing PAWS,   the
Secretary of Agriculture will have to assure that the animal care   
regulations take
into account breeders and dealers who conduct their  operations  in a
residential setting.
I want to make clear that  PAWS is a very different piece of legislation  than
the bills that  Senator Durbin and I have introduced in previous   
Congresses. 
PAWS does not require  or justify creating any new  animal care standards,
like our previous legislation  did.  It  focuses only on bringing  under
regulation high volume commercial  dealers currently evading regulation and  
on
strengthening the  Secretary of Agricultureâ??s ability to identify and bring   
into
compliance high volume dealers who are not in compliance with  existing law  
or, as
a last resort, shut them down.
Senator  Durbin and I in the Senate, along with our colleagues 
Representatives  Gerlach and Farr who have introduced PAWS in the House of   
Representatives,
consulted with a broad array of animal interest and  animal  welfare groups in
creating PAWS.  We  believe that  the enactment of PAWS will be a major
milestone in the history of   animal protection in the United States.  We are
delighted that it has  brought  together animal interest groups and animal 
welfare
groups  that in the past have  often been on opposite sides of animal  
legislation,
including our own past  bills.  Having said  that, no  legislation is perfect
when introduced.  As Chairman of  the Senate Agriculture Committeeâ??s
Subcommittee on  Research,  Nutrition and General Legislation, which has 
jurisdiction over
PAWS,  I  intend to convene a hearing and mark-up of PAWS shortly after  the
August recess  to make technical corrections, and to clarify some  of the bill
â??
s
language to  better reflect our intentions as set  forth in this statement.   
PAWS is not intended to restrict  breeding or impose a hardship on rescue  and
shelter  organizations.  PAWS  specifically recognizes the importance  of
protecting small breeders and the  non-commercial purebred dog and  cat fancy 
from
federal regulation.  My family and I purchased our  beloved  German Shepherd 
dog
Schatzie from a small breeder.   We and Schatzie raised a litter of  puppies
in our own home last year,  and fully understand the hard work and  commitment
that it  requires.  I also  know that most commercial breeders are dedicated  
to
their profession and to  their animals.  I believe that  PAWS  will protect
small hobby and show breeders and the vast majority  of compliant  commercial
breeders as well as the public from those  breeders and brokers who  evade or 
fail
to comply with the  law.  And, most importantly, it will protect the  animals
themselves.  I urge my colleagues and all those in  the  animal welfare 
community
to join us in this effort."   
*********************************





Kathy
three generations of Dual Titled Champions  live here!

visit _Pine Hill German Shepherd  Dogs_ 
(http://www.geocities.com/pinehillgsds/)  

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: