[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: OFA requiring Permanent ID
- From: Robert Utter <rautter001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx" <edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 16:09:22 -0400
Ed. Is it principle or stubbornness (nobody tells me what to do). If a dog is
lost of stolen, it might be valuable to have that microchip. I don't know of
anyone telling me I had to do it. I just thought it was a smart thing to do.
Anne, TN
Sent from my iPad
On May 26, 2012, at 3:39 PM, edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I have an OFA 'Good' Army son who is NOPI...why?...because I chose not to be
> forced to chip my dog......matter of principle...as are most things for
> me..Ed Hill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: barbara17236@xxxxxxx
> To: "paris-smith k9s" <paris-smith_k9s@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 12:23:35 PM
> Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: OFA requiring Permanent ID
>
> Nowadays, there is no logical reason for a dog not to be chipped or tattooed,
> IMO. So, I always wonder why dogs have NOPI after their OFA numbers. Gosh,
> the dog is at least 24 months old! Makes you wonder if it really was the
> actual dog being submitted or not. Especially since most vets can microchip
> animals and could do at the time of the xrays.
>
> And, before everyone starts screaming all of the dogs, or at least their NOPI
> dogs are legit, it is my own personal opinion. I think ALL submissions
> should be permanently identified PERIOD.
>
> ALL of our dogs, even pets, are chipped. If I buy a puppy who isn't chipped,
> I chip it. ALL of our puppies leave here chipped.
>
>
>
> Barb Hively - PA
> DNA. It's what makes a white, a German Shepherd
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paris-Smith_k9s <paris-smith_k9s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 'Kay Springer' <showgsd@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: 'Sally' <sallyhayden5@xxxxxxxxx>; showgsd-l <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sat, May 26, 2012 2:22 pm
> Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: OFA requiring Permanent ID
>
>
> I agree too Kay. This "loophole" does need to be fixed. I never realized
> hat this could happen. Maybe I just have encountered vets that made it a
> equirement for them since they are signing it. Each vet I have ever seen
> as required my dogs to have a microchip. Although if I was putting my
> ignature on something verifying a dog I would want all my bases covered
> oo. Thank you Kay for finding this info and showing it to me I definitely
> id not know was not a requirement. Sad as that is!
> ammy
>
> From: Kay Springer [mailto:showgsd@xxxxxxx]
> ent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 11:16 AM
> o: paris-smith_k9s@xxxxxxxxxxx
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2011. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
