Some interesting wording on the GRCA letter to AKC. I think they make some good points. Diane Holliday Scottsdale, AZ This is the letter the Golden Retriever Club of America has written to the AKC. Permission to pass on is granted. Copies of this letter will also be sent to other involved parties. Barbara Branstad, Sec'y, GRCA Mr. Dennis Sprung President and CEO The American Kennel Club 280 Madison Avenue New York, NY Aug. 1, 2005 Dear Dennis, Thank you for taking the time to talk with me about the PAWS legislation. We certainly hope that AKC is sympathetic to the barrage of emails and intense pressure being placed on our Board of Directors to make an official stand against any legislation regulating the sale and/or breeding of purebred dogs. As I mentioned to you, we find the wording of the bill and even the very concept of the bill troublesome. I am certain that AKC also has concerns based on Senator Santorum's past legislation and known ties to animal "rights" groups. As the legislation is currently written, the Golden Retriever Club of America is unable to support this bill. The GRCA feels that the time has come for the Senator's office to present a printed, publicly viewable, revised version of this legislation. In particular we would like the following items addressed: 1. The wording of the bill must be more accurate. The double negativeand the and/or clause is confusing and misleading. Furthermore the wording does not identify the practice of co- ownership or co-breeding, common in the fancy. 2. The bill attempts to group all sales together. Internet sales, foreign sales and sales from volume breeders each have their individual characteristics which do not fit nicely into one tidy category. 3. Classifying all hobby breeders as "dealers", which is even in the latest press release from the Senator's office, can potentially create zoning issues in residential areas and put the true hobbyists at risk for losing their homes. 4. If you go with the 6/25 numbers it is entirely possible that a breeder might meet the criteria one year but not the next. That would make him/her a dealer one year and a hobby breeder the next. There is no provision for change of status in the current legislation. 5. The protection of not-for-profit rescue groups and organizations mustbe clearly spelled out and be without veiled reference to re-homing dogs. 6. The protection of the true hobby breeder must be clearly spelled out and the extent of that protection defined. 7. The mechanism of enforcement must be disclosed. 8. The funding and Departmental responsibilities of the legislation must be outlined. We are sure AKC is communicating to us what you are being told but we want additional assurance that you are not being purposefully misled by the experienced and well-funded animal rights lobbyists who support Senator Santorum. In other words, we know what Dr Holt and Bob Kane have to say, now it's time to hear what Senator Santorum has to say. It is our sincere hope that the AKC will accurately represent the parent clubs and will withdraw their support of this legislation if there is not significant change to its wording. Sincerely, Christine Miele President, The Golden Retriever Club of America ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================