[ SHOWGSD-L ] FLA - not just Palm Beach County -- Miami, too...and then, and then...........

  • From: "Peggy" <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <GSDCALegislative@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:02:46 -0500

This info comes directly from the AKC legislation department (altho I've 
tried to correct the bad grammar).  Please note that the proposals are FULL 
TO THE BRIM OF ANIMAL RIGHTS LANGUAGE
and ideas.........this is frightening.  If it passes, Floridians are in deep 
doodoo...and of course, other states will follow.
Peggy

AKC Legislative Alert: FL: Miami-Dade Propose Drastic Changes for Animal 
Owners

  Permission to Cross Post

  Below is the AKC Legislative Alert on the proposed Miami-Dade Ordinance.
  The proposed ordinance includes zoning changes and pet limit laws, breeder 
licensing and mandatory microchipping.
  The AR groups have targeted Florida and are working to get similar 
legislation passed in Palm Beach County and other parts of the state.
  Your help is needed.  Florida residents that can attend the public hearing 
on December 18th are urged to do so.  If you cannot attend or live out of 
state, please send an email or call the county commissioner to respectfully 
voice your opposition.
  If you own more than four dogs and live on less than an acre, which of 
your dogs will you give up?  and this will be decided by a public hearing!

    http://www.akc.org/news/index.cfm?article_id=3379

          Miami-Dade County Proposes Drastic Changes for Animal Owners
 The Miami-Dade County Commission will be holding a public hearing at 9:30am 
on Tuesday, December 18th to discuss a variety of changes to the animal 
control ordinance including limiting the number of pets a resident may own, 
implementing hobby breeder licensing, requiring mandatory microchipping for 
dog breeders and restricting rescue organizations. Concerned dog owners and 
breeders are asked to attend and speak against these proposed changes. If 
you are unable to attend, please send an email to the county commissioners 
or call their offices. As always, please be polite and respectful.

Summary of the Proposed Changes

Zoning Changes and Pet Limits:
The revised ordinance will limit the number of dogs a resident may own based 
on the size of the property. If you own more than the allowed number, you 
will be considered a kennel and a public hearing will be held to decide if 
you may keep your animals. Additionally, you will be required to allow 
animal control to inspect your premises and must meet specified kennel 
standards.

These thresholds are arbitrary and do not take in to account the 
reproductive capability of the animals. A resident could be deemed a kennel 
even if none of the animals are capable of reproducing or are ever used for 
breeding! There does NOT appear to be a clause to protect those residents 
who already own more than the allowed number.
   If the property is less than one acre, a resident may have no more than 4 
dogs.
   If the property is less than two acres, a resident may have no more than 
6 dogs.
   If the property is two acres or more, a resident may own up to eight 
dogs.

Hobby Breeder License:
The county currently allows a lifetime license, but under the new proposal 
this would be an annual license. Additionally, the fee for the license is 
not specified in the ordinance and could easily be very expensive, placing 
an unreasonable burden on local, responsible breeders. State law provides a 
definition of pet dealer, which is the same as the one used in this 
ordinance. There is no compelling reason to spend resources and taxpayer 
money to license breeders who fall below that threshold.
Pet Dealer and Kennel Inspections:
The new ordinance would require anyone who qualifies as a "pet dealer" 
(anyone who sells more than 20 dogs or 2 litters in one year, whichever is 
greater) or who requires a kennel license (anyone who exceeds the thresholds 
set above) to be inspected by animal control. The fees for these licenses 
are not specified within the ordinance, but due to the expense to animal 
control to conduct these inspections, it is reasonable to assume they would 
be very expensive.

The standards set for kennels are designed for commercial enterprises, but 
may not be reasonable or workable for someone who simply owns 5 animals or 
who breeds perhaps 3 litters a year in their home.

Additionally, these same standards do not apply to city or county 
facilities. If they are for the health and safety of the animals, then they 
should apply consistently to all facilities.

Breeders Must Microchip:
The new ordinance would require that all animals sold be implanted with a 
microchip and that information provided to animal control. Many animals will 
be sold to new owners outside the county, therefore this provision creates 
an unnecessary financial burden for both breeders and animal services who 
must develop and administer a program to track this information. Animal 
control is not required to microchip animals that they place.

As part of our ongoing efforts to promote responsible dog ownership, the AKC 
encourages dog owners to properly identify their pets. We believe, however, 
that the final decision about identification-whether by collar, tattoo or 
microchip-should be made by the owner, not the government.

Rescues:
If adopted, the new ordinance would allow shelters to release animals only 
to animal rescues registered as a 501 (c)(3) in Florida. This will deprive 
the county of being able to use many breed and club rescues that for tax 
filing purposes have not elected to become 501(c)(3)s. This will mean fewer 
animals are fostered and placed, leading to more euthanizations.

Tethering:
The new ordinance would make it illegal to tether a dog outside unless the 
dog can be supervised by the responsible party and limits tethering to three 
hours.

Additional Requirements:
   Would hold landlords responsible for the actions of any animal maintained 
on premises they own. Fewer property owners will be willing to rent to 
animal owners, potentially increasing shelter populations.
   License fees for intact and sterilized animals are not specified within 
the ordinance, so there is no way to judge if these will be reasonable. 
Residents are best served by having license fees set in the ordinance itself 
and then having the county commission adjust them when necessary.
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
   Attend the County Commission meeting on December 18th.
9:30 am
Commission Chambers, Second Floor of the Stephen P. Clark Center
111 N.W. First Street,
Miami, FL 33128


   Send a letter or email to the county commissioners asking them to oppose 
these changes. District 1 - Barbara J Jordan
305-375-5694 Fax 3055-474-3011
District1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 2 - Dorrin D Rolle
305-375-4833 - Fax 305-694-2781
District2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 3 - Andrew M Edmonson
305-375-5393 - Fax 305-638-6906
District3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 4 - Sally A Heyman
305-375-5128 - Fax 305-372-6179
District4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 5 - Bruno Barreiro (Commission Chairman)
305-643-8525 - Fax 305-643-8528
District5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 6 - Rebeca Sosa
305-375-5996 - Fax 305-267-6366
District6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District7 - Carlos A Gimenez
305-375-5680 - Fax 305-372-6103
District7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 8 - Kathy Sorenson
305-375-5218 - Fax 305-372-6073
District8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 9 - Dennis C, Moss
305-375-4832 - Fax 305 234-4938
District9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 10 - Javier D. Souto
305-375-4835 - Fax 305 375-3456
District10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 11 - Joe A Martinez
305-375-5511 - Fax 305-375-5883
District11@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 12 - Jose Diaz
305-375-4343 - Fax 305 372-6109
District12@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

District 13 - Natacha Seijas
305-375-4831 - Fax 305-375-2011
District4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mayor Carlos Alvarez
305-375-5071 - Fax 305-375-3618
mayor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

County Attorney Murray Greenberg
305-375-5151 - Fax 305-375-5634
atty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

County Manager George M. Burges
305-375-5311 - Fax 305-375-1262
Manager@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] FLA - not just Palm Beach County -- Miami, too...and then, and then...........