[sextante-users] Re: I have a problem with the Sextante vectorization algorithm

  • From: Antoni Riba <antoniriba@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: sextante-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:32:48 +0200

Thanks Victor,

from now on I will focus on the use of gvSIGCE for geoprocessing.

Regards,

Antoni Riba



2012/5/9 Victor Olaya <volayaf@xxxxxxxxx>

> For using SEXTANTE gvSIG CE is much more better than 1.11, since the
> version in 1.11 is and old one and is not correctly installed.
>
> Please use gvSIG CE instead of 1.11
>
> 1.12 should be better and have the latest SEXTANTE release
>
> Regards
>
> Victor
>
> 2012/5/9 Antoni Riba <antoniriba@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > This is my first time in list.
> >
> > I have a problem with the Sextante vectorization algorithm.
> >
> > Working with gvSIG 1.11.0 final (Build1305) on Windows XP, with Java
> > 1.6.0_06.
> >
> > I vectorized polygons but some of the polygone are not well done. However
> > when I use the GRASS vectorization is done correctly. In principle there
> is
> > no problem because I can use the algorithms of GRASS, but I would like to
> > use the Sextante without having this problem. Is ther any solution?.
> >
> > I attached some pictures so you can see the result of the vectorization
> of
> > Sextant and GRASS.
> >
> > I downloaded gvSIGCE and I see that the problem I had with gvSIG 1.11 is
> > solved, I just vectorize well, like the GRASS. Do you recomend me
> > forget gvSIG and use gvSIGCE?
> >
> > A greeting and thank you very much,
> >
> > -
> > Antoni
>
>


-- 
Antoni

Other related posts: