[rollei_list] Re: Why Rollei T?
- From: Dennis Purdy <dpurdyphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:56:13 -0800
On Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005, at 08:42 US/Pacific, Peter K. wrote:
> had inquired forever about the Rollei T and 220. Evans is completely
> wrong. The T does not have a 220 capability. To validate this, I wrote
> Herr Prochnow some time back and he replied:
>
> "The Rolleiflex T was never made for film 220."
>
> I saved the email and still have it, so I a, 100% certain on this. I
> know no one that has a Rollei T with 220 capability, and you cannot
> add a 220 switch as you can on the Rollei 3.5 or 2.8 Planar/Xenotar
> TLRs.
>
> Peter K
I just pulled this off Oceanside.com
220 modifications are possible on ,
Rolleiflex TLRs, (including Rolleiflex 2.8F, 3.5F, Rolleiflex 2.8E-3,
2.8E-2, 2.8E, 2.8D, 2.8C, , 2.8B, 2.8A, Rolleiflex 3.5E-3, 3.5E-2,
3.5E, 3.5, Automat X, 3.5 Automat MX, Automat MX E-V, Tele Rolleiflex
and the Wide-Angle Rolleiflex).
Other related posts:
