[rollei_list] Re: "There is NF 220 Rollei T" (BS!)
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:53:37 -0700
Wise guy, huh! knuk, knuk, knuk!
On 4/23/05, Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Peter,
>=20
> This has been answered.
> You are excusable :-)
>=20
> Jerry
>=20
> "Peter K." wrote:
>=20
> > So Jerry,=3D20
> > What camera do yo uuse your adapter in? Is this a special T wih a
> > 12/24 exposure mechanism? I think someone stated that, so excuse me if
> > I am asking something that was already answered.
> >
> > Peter K
> >
> > On 4/22/05, Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Peter, Peter, Peter,
> > >=3D20
> > > Horizontal, horizontal, horizontal! The film only advances about 28/=
30 m=3D
> > m
> > > with each stroke of the crank. Confirmed on page 18-409 of Prochnow.
> > > Referred to as K8K (T24) Special production, 250 cameras made. PR 184=
/1
> > > Direct order, No price listed. Serial #s 156000 to 156249.
> > >=3D20
> > > But still no 220 capability. But if it were, just think, 48 exposure=
s pe=3D
> > r roll!
> > >=3D20
> > > Jerry
> > >=3D20
> > > "Peter K." wrote:
> > >=3D20
> > > > What horizontal 24x36. Do you mean 6x4.5cm? There is also a mask yo=
u
> > > > place on the viewing screen for 4x4cm (Superslide format) but the
> > > > actual film is recorded as 6x4.5cm.
> > > >
> > > > Jerry, you are a man of many cameras.
> > > >
> > > > Peter K
> > > > "Der Grieche" mit einem T
> > > >
> > > > On 4/22/05, Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Jim
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > > > The Rolleikin was set for VERTICAL 24x36 exposures. The Spezial =
T ki=3D
> > t
> > > > > was for HORIZONTAL 24x36. I have the frame/mask for that.
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > > > It is still not for 220 film!
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > > > Jerry
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > > > Jim Somberg wrote:
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > > > > According to my two Rollei T's, the film pressure plate is sett=
able=3D
> > to =3D3D
> > > > either 6X6 cm or 24X36MM, the latter with a Rolleikin, of course.
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: David Seifert
> > > > > > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 6:34 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "There is a 220 Rollei T"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ardeshir Mehta wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >On Friday, April 22, 2005, at 07:02 PM, David Seifert wrote=
:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>Marc,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>You were only partially in error. The units in question wer=
e eq=3D
> > uipp=3D3D
> > > > ed
> > > > > > >>with a 24 frame counter. The camera still used 120 film but=
pro=3D
> > duce=3D3D
> > > > d
> > > > > > >>24 smaller (24x36?) on the film via a masking system. We we=
nt t=3D
> > hrou=3D3D
> > > > gh
> > > > > > >>this last year in more detail than anyone cares to recall.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>Best Regards,
> > > > > > >>David
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Oh? This is interesting! Are you sure the prints were as sma=
ll a=3D
> > s 24=3D3D
> > > > x36
> > > > > > >mm? Could they have been 30x60 mm?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >A.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Ardeshir,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just for you, I look this up again. According to Prochnow in=
Rol=3D
> > lei
> > > > > > Report 2 page 409 there were 250 units of this type built in =
June=3D
> > 196=3D3D
> > > > 1.
> > > > > > He notes that these were "Direktverkauf, nicht gelistet", dir=
ect =3D
> > sale=3D3D
> > > > ,
> > > > > > no price listed. I interpret that to mean that these were a =
cust=3D
> > om
> > > > > > order batch. The customer is not mentioned. They used 120 f=
ilm =3D
> > and
> > > > > > produced either 12 6x6 images per roll or 24 24x36 images per=
rol=3D
> > l us=3D3D
> > > > ing
> > > > > > the special mask kit. Thus, they had a 12/24 frame counter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the record, the standard model of that run (56,000 units)=
cam=3D
> > e wi=3D3D
> > > > th
> > > > > > a 12/16 frame counter equipped to do 12 or 16 exposures per 1=
20 r=3D
> > oll.
> > > > > > The mask kit produced 16 4.5x5 images.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thus spake Prochnow!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > David
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > > >=3D3D20
> > > >
> > > > --=3D3D20
> > > > Peter K
> > > > =3D3DD3=3D3DBF=3D3DD5=3D3DAC
> > >=3D20
> > >=3D20
> >
> > --=3D20
> > Peter K
> > =3DD3=3DBF=3DD5=3DAC
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
Other related posts:
