[rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollei problem
- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:08:09 -0400
As always, looking forward to seeing your fine work.
I should probably put in a shameless plug for the Rollei Gallery, to
which you and others who contribute here are members. There is really
some outstanding work exhibited there and all are welcome...
http://www.flickr.com/groups/rolleiusersgroup/
Eric Goldstein
--
On 8/25/08, Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric, the best tests are the photographs I took with the 'cord IV, the tonal
> rendition and contrast are excellent in general, I'll refer several samples
> next Friday or you can see my more recent sample taken with the 'cord IV at
> your Rollei Gallery.-
>
>
> Carlos
>
>
> --- El lun 25-ago-08, Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
> > De: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollei problem
>
> > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Fecha: lunes, 25 de agosto de 2008, 10:55 pm
>
> > Carlos -
> >
> > I have Rolleis with factory baffles, such as my 2.8 C and
> > Tele. And I
> > have my 'Cord III which I flocked. The difference is
> > obvious. I
> > suggest you try the test described by Richard Knoppow in a
> > previous
> > post...
> >
> > Eric Goldstein
> >
> > --
> >
> > On 8/25/08, Carlos Manuel Freaza
> > <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Eric, they are not the best after 50 years or more
> > from the camera manufacture, anyway I'm lucky with my
> > 'cord IV, it does not have noticeable internal
> > reflection problems, the baffles work fine.-
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > > --- El lun 25-ago-08, Eric Goldstein
> > <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> > >
> > > > De: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollie problem
> > > > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Fecha: lunes, 25 de agosto de 2008, 10:31 pm
> > >
> > > > I did this a million years ago. I think I got it
> > here:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.fpi-protostar.com/flock.htm
> > > >
> > > > I agree that the Rollei baffles are not the
> > best...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eric Goldstein
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/25/08, Richard Knoppow
> > <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From:
> > "Eric
> > > > Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:42 PM
> > > > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollie
> > problem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > An even greater bargain is the
> > 'Cord III.
> > > > Same ergonomics and nice
> > > > > > aperture. I flocked mine with
> > ultraflat camera
> > > > velvet... seemingly
> > > > > > superior to the factory baffles on
> > later cameras,
> > > > which would make
> > > > > > this treatment impossible...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eric Goldstein
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Where did you obtain this stuff? I can
> > think of
> > > > several applications
> > > > > for it.
> > > > > BTW, I've found that the edges of
> > the baffles
> > > > can reflect a surprizing
> > > > > amount of light. Try shining a small
> > flashlight into
> > > > the lens while looking
> > > > > at the back (with the shutter open of
> > course). I have
> > > > no doubt flocking or
> > > > > velvet could do better.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Richard Knoppow
> > > > > Los Angeles, CA, USA
> > > > > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Rollei List
> > > >
> > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with
> > > > 'subscribe'
> > > > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > www.freelists.org
> > > >
> > > > - Unsubscribe at
> > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by
> > logging
> > > > into www.freelists.org
> > > >
> > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Cocina
> > > Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
> > > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
> > > ---
> > > Rollei List
> > >
> > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > 'subscribe'
> > > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > www.freelists.org
> > >
> > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with
> > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by
> > logging into www.freelists.org
> > >
> > > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> > >
> > >
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> > into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
> Yahoo! Cocina
> Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
> http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
