[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C and Kodak Portra 400
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 08:57:11 -0300
A lonely pine in the afternoon:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13312146873/
The SL35 E again, this time with the original box. It does not show
the best condition, but it's the original box...:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13311965625/
Carlos
2014-03-16 9:23 GMT-03:00 CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>:
> The Kodak Portra 120 ISO 400 that replaced NC and VC versions has a
> very small grain considering it's an ISO 400 film.
> It was rainy, but you always find a moment and something to take a
> photograph. I was often using the reliable 2.8C Xenotar last year and
> this year from January; I think it deserves a rest after this roll:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13172559944/
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13172539564/
>
> Carlos
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
