[rollei_list] Re: O.T Polaroid type 55 b+W film and DIGITAL Photography
- From: Kenneth FRAZIER <kennybod@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:40:36 -0400
On Mar 27, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Newhouse230@xxxxxxx wrote:
> To wander further O.T. I wonder if one of the members with a more technical
> background can predict if/when the dynamic range and tonal curve of digital
> images will improve in the way that CD sound quality did.....going from a
> very 'clipped' quality to something that could yield improved audio nuance.
> I am not an audiophile, so I don't know the technical terms, but to my ear
> CD's of early vintage completely lacked 'sweetness' and character but have
> improved over the years. I can't help but wonder if the same thing will be
> said for digital image capture.
>
Folks,
I've been too busy with work to do much on the photo lists, but this thread
caught my eye. I was going through some Rolleiflex prints the other day and
noticed the difference, after shooting almost nothing but digital for a while.
To my eye, at least, there is really a significant difference.
I think I'm going to dust off the Rolleicord IV and shoot a few rolls.
Ken
--------------------------------------
The Rev. Ken Frazier
First Congregational Church
Waterbury, CT 06702
203-757-0331
pastorfcchurch@xxxxxxxxxxx
kennybod@xxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
