And since most triotars are antiques, taphonomic considerations will dominate -- IE, what is the condition of this particular example. For ex, I have 4 Leitz Elmars, all different, and completely different in character. I suspect, as per an analogy I've used before, old lenses are like old fiddles, more unique than similar... P.J. Nebergall On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:48:05 +0000 Joe B <joe-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm wondering about the Triotar lens. Do people who've used it like > the > effect for wide-aperture portraits and such where a hard, sharp look > is > not the desired result? Used wide open, is the "look" recognisably > different from that of a Tessar or Xenar used wide open- is it > sufficiently different to warrant using it instead sometimes? What > about > the other wider apertures before you get to f8? > > Any other info about the "Triotar look" would be much appreciated. > > FWIW I always avoided any three-element lens, thinking that a > Tessar-type was always automatically a better choice. With a lot of > vintage gear I still don't own a single three-element lens. If I do > this > it will be a big step for me..... > > Joe B. > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list