At least she has a grasp of what her cameras are worth even if a little high. I have no nod of approval for someone that laughingly brags they bought a box of M3's with several lenses from some dumb widow for $25..... A friend of a friend (An accomplished violinist) once bought a $50k violin at a garage sale for $50 and for years bragged about it.... Very sad On Jul 22, 2011, at 6:46 AM, "Roger Wiser" <rwiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yesterday I went to a unique rummage sale in a upscale lake home small town > in southern WI, near my home. Film cameras were advertised. A woman, in her > 60's had the sale in her garage. When I asked about the camera she gave me a > 4 page inventory of cameras and asked me what camera I wanted to view. I > indicated the Rollei. She pulled out a Rollei 66? 120 SLR with a case that > looked unused. I also looked at Rolleiflex case that was unused. She had some > Rollei lens but I did not examine them since 120 SLR's do not interest me. I > thought her prices were high at $1200 for the SLR and $100 for the case so I > did not attempt to bargain. > > As a matter of further information: > > With all the > cameras listed I asked her if she was involved in a camera store. She said no > these belonged to a friend that bought cameras over the years and many were > these were little used or unused. (She did not say it was her husband so I > surmised it could have been a boyfriend who possibly died.) In scanning the > inventory, I noted that many were 35mm's. I recall a bunch of Konica SLR > cameras and lens. I do not recall any other TLR's or folders except for a > Kodak Vigilant. I noted a Mercury II (I owned one when I was in HS). It was > listed for $50 that I thought was high. I did not look at it. If it would > have been in a unused condition like the Rollei it may have been worth > $25.This is all the information I have. If you are interested in her email > address please contact me so you can deal with her directly. > > rwiser@xxxxxxxxxxx >