[rollei_list] Re: Comparison: scanned Rolleiflex Slide vs. 100 ISO
- From: Jan Decher <Jan.Decher@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:06:38 -0500
Kirk,
Didn't get your picture via the list but I am sure I can work more on getting
rid of the color cast myself. Will try to scan it again.
Cost aside, for me it comes down which camera I prefer to use for this type of
image. The Rolleiflex wins easily. I like the waistlevel viewing and the
square format for composing (the main reason I got rid of the otherwise superb
Contax 645).
OTOH, the Canon 60D with 15-85mm and 70-300 mm L IS zooms won easily for
interior pictures of plants and animals in the Montreal, Biodome, the day
before.
Jan
On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:07 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
> From: Kirk Thompson <thompsonkirk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Comparison: scanned Rolleiflex Slide vs. 100 ISO
> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:40:07 -0800
> On my (calibrated) monitor the Rollei image doesn't have 'warmer tones,' it
> has a vivid color cast. Part of the anomaly is that it had no sRGB profile
> (standard for web).
> Shouldn't it look something like this (attached)?
> I happen to like both versions ˆ Rollei for content, Canon for plausible
> color.
> Kirk
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: Comparison: scanned Rolleiflex Slide vs. 100 ISO - Jan Decher
