> So, if your not using a 4 channel controller, then what? Then you get more creative ;) On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:22 PM, <ENHolmberg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > So, if your not using a 4 channel controller, then what? > > > In a message dated 5/16/2011 1:07:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > indanapt@xxxxxxxxx writes: > > I have an early Control but its dead. > > --------------------------------------- > Jeff Gortatowsky, Redondo Beach, CA | Twitter: JeffGortatowsky | Yahoo: > indanapt > "(Scientific) Skepticism is not a set of beliefs, it is a set of methods for > asking questions about reality." -- Doctor Steven Novella > ________________________________ > From: Lakestake Rocketry <lakestake@xxxxxxxxx> > To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 1:57 PM > Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Launch Today > > If you have a flight computer you need no addtional electronics. As > an example Control has 4 chanels, you can use two for dual deploy, one > for airstarts and the last for 'chute release with no addtional > systems. > > Matt > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:03 PM, <ENHolmberg@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> In a message dated 5/15/2011 11:21:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >> indanapt@xxxxxxxxx writes: >> >> I guess it would be a use of a another pyro channel to release the chute >> when the altitude stops changing. >> >> --------------------------------------- >> Jeff Gortatowsky, Redondo Beach, CA | Twitter: JeffGortatowsky | Yahoo: >> indanapt >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jeffgortatowsky >> "(Scientific) Skepticism is not a set of beliefs, it is a set of methods >> for >> asking questions about reality." -- Doctor Steven Novella >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:52 PM >> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Launch Today >> >> Well, I guess it all depends on how one would define "breeze" or a >> "winding >> road". >> >> Dual deploy is great, but I didn't have much luck with using streamers for >> the drogue. >> >> Very good, and yes, always spend lots of money on rocket stuff! It really >> does make you feel better, and at least your credit card balance will be >> in >> the stratosphere. >> >> Richard >> >> Has any one worked out how to do a simple partial release of the parachute >> after landing without or at least minimal electronics? >> >> Eric Holmberg > > -- > ROC-Chat mailing list > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > > Pacific Daylight Time, >> indanapt@xxxxxxxxx writes: >> >> I guess it would be a use of a another pyro channel to release the chute >> when the altitude stops changing. >> >> --------------------------------------- >> Jeff Gortatowsky, Redondo Beach, CA | Twitter: JeffGortatowsky | Yahoo: >> indanapt >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jeffgortatowsky >> "(Scientific) Skepticism is not a set of beliefs, it is a set of methods >> for >> asking questions about reality." -- Doctor Steven Novella >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:52 PM >> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Launch Today >> >> Well, I guess it all depends on how one would define "breeze" or a >> "winding >> road". >> >> Dual deploy is great, but I didn't have much luck with using streamers for >> the drogue. >> >> Very good, and yes, always spend lots of money on rocket stuff! It really >> does make you feel better, and at least your credit card balance will be >> in >> the stratosphere. >> >> Richard >> >> Has any one worked out how to do a simple partial release of the parachute >> after landing without or at least minimal electronics? >> >> Eric Holmberg > > -- > ROC-Chat mailing list > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > > > -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat