Yep, there are twelve in the flange and I'll be using at least six in the future; probably all dozen. :) It does make me wonder about the cheap steel used in standard T-nuts as well. I'll look into using stronger steel in future, since it doesn't seem like the threads should strip out so easily. John On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx>wrote: > John**** > > ** ** > > An old pro like yourself only used 4 screws when the > Aeropack Flange has about 8 to 12 on there, it looks like you got lucky and > kept the case until the end.**** > > ** ** > > Jack G**** > > ** ** > > *From:* roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *John Coker > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:13 AM > > *To:* roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [roc-chat] Re: Aerotech Motor Design Question**** > > ** ** > > Sometimes even the T-nuts aren't enough. There is a *lot* of force > generated by the weight of a large motor case, even when empty. I used four > #6 T-nuts through the aft C.R. to hold on a 98mm Aero-Pack retainer and the > screws pulled right out of the T-nuts!**** > > ** ** > > http://jcrocket.com/arliss2008.shtml#mavericks2008**** > > ** ** > > John**** > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> > wrote:**** > > Chris**** > > **** > > The top one is under Madcow componants on my site and the > screws are barrel screws so you just screw them into your aft ring then the > threaded screw will screw into those, these type retainers are for rockets > that are already built and done. On future rockets you need to think ahead > and use Aeropack but you have to leave your motor tube extended out past > your aft ring when you build up to 1/2” then JB weld the Aeropack on until > you get to 54, 75 and 98mm then you go back to flush tube with aft closure > because they have flanges on them for bolting on. There are glue on > Aeropacs in the 54mm but when you start doing 75mm and 98mm I don’t > believe in glueing on my motor retention with the powerful motors on the > market today, just a extra precaution that I do.**** > > **** > > Jack G**** > > **** > > *From:* roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Chris Coffee > *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2012 11:43 PM**** > > > *To:* roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [roc-chat] Re: Aerotech Motor Design Question**** > > **** > > Hey Jack,**** > > **** > > What is the one in the top picture that looks like a exhaust gasket? I > tried enlarging the picture but it becomes unreadable. I like the idea of > the little clips, but my aft ring is already glued in place and I am not > sure how I would get the female part of the screw set on the inside of the > ring.**** > > **** > > *From:* Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> **** > > *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2012 6:22 PM**** > > *To:* roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **** > > *Subject:* [roc-chat] Re: Aerotech Motor Design Question**** > > **** > > If you have room on your aft ring you could use two screws and two washers > or these type motor retainers**** > > **** > > [image: Motor Retainer 29mm]**** > > **** > > [image: Z Clip Style Motor Retainer Set]**** > > **** > > **** > > Jack G**** > > **** > > *From:* roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ > mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On > Behalf Of *Chris Coffee > *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2012 6:03 PM > *To:* roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [roc-chat] Re: Aerotech Motor Design Question**** > > **** > > “Remember, friends don't let friends friction fit.”**** > > **** > > On that note, both rockets that we have use friction fit for the motors. > Now that the rocket is assembled, is there a way to incorporate a motor > retention device into them? They both have the 29mm motor mounts. I am > wanting use my RMS but since the rockets only use friction to retain the > motor, I am worried about losing a $65 motor casing. Any suggestions.**** > > **** > > Chris **** > > **** > > *From:* Lakestake Rocketry <lakestake@xxxxxxxxx> **** > > *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2012 5:39 PM**** > > *To:* roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **** > > *Subject:* [roc-chat] Re: Aerotech Motor Design Question**** > > **** > > Cool, another "Kevlar vs. Nylon" moment!**** > > I have never lost a motor with positive retention. It comes down to a > safety issue: if you kick the motor and don't deploy your recovery the > rocket still comes back to earth.**** > > Remember, friends don't let friends friction fit.**** > > Matt**** > > On Nov 24, 2012 10:41 PM, "David Erbas-White" <derbas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:**** > > On 11/24/2012 10:10 PM, brian.morilak@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > ...and as a follow on, now that I think about it, I've had a number of > Aerotech engine hooks that didn't do a very good job or retaining the > motor, and have kicked both single-use and reloadable motors. Thus, I now > ALWAYS put a couple of wraps of tape around the aft end of a reloadable... > > David Erbas-White**** > > On topic question:**** > > Is it sufficient to use friction (masking tape) on a 24mm F/G motor for > "negative" (ejection charge) retention? Or is an engine hook or end > cap-type retainer an absolute must? > > On Nov 24, 2012, at 9:05 PM, David Erbas-White <derbas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:**** > > On 11/24/2012 7:08 PM, Chris Coffee wrote: > > Older Aerotech motors were smooth. Then, for a while, they sold them with > a cardboard ring that you could epoxy to the aft end of the motor to act as > a stop. For the past few years, all Aerotech E/F/G motors (at least, that > I am aware of) have the ring at the back molded into the case. > > I have found that (if you're using the Estes Pro Series II rockets - not > motors) that you have to remove the label from the motor or they simply > won't fit. The RMS motors (reloadables), however, do fit just fine. > > David Erbas-White**** > > We are looking to buy more motors for our rockets. We need F & G size > motors. The motors we just used were the Estes Pro Series II Single-Use > motors. Neither of our rockets have a motor retainer, so my question is; do > the Aerotech motors also have that protruding edge that stops the motor > from going all the way up into the motor mount tube like the Estes does? > Although the Estes worked fine, I am not real happy about having to buy > igniters for each motor (especially if the just pop like one of ours did) > when Aerotech supplies an igniter with their motors. Thanks.**** > > **** > > Christopher L. Coffee**** > > **** > > **** > > ** ** >