[retroforth] Re: does> versus class>
- From: Charles Childers <charles.childers@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: retroforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:24:29 -0500
Hi Ton,
On 1/9/06, Ton ´t Lam <ton.tlam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Charles,
>
> I may have missed some discussion. Why is class> used instead of does>?
> This doesn't sound much retro to me.
This change was mentioned on October 14 at http://rf.fcode.org/news/?p=183
Basically I haven't used either does> or class> in the last few months. I
intend to eventually add "does>" to the ans.forth module; class> is a bit
more flexible.
--
Charles R. Childers
http://www.retroforth.org
Other related posts:
