[real-eyes] Fw: [LarrysList] Planned wireless Internet network threatens GPS

"jose" <crunch1@xxxxxxxxx> · Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:46:05 -0500

Jose Lopez, President
Lopez Language Services, LLC

"We Speak Your Language"
Call us anytime at 888.824.3022

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Staples" <lstaples@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Larry's List" <LarrysList@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:54 AM
Subject: [LarrysList] Planned wireless Internet network threatens GPS

Planned wireless Internet network threatens GPS

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110406/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_gps_threats>

WASHINGTON – A new, ultra-fast wireless Internet network is threatening to 
overpower GPS signals across the U.S. and interfere with everything from 
airplanes to police cars to consumer navigation devices.

The problem stems from a recent government decision to let a Virginia 
company called LightSquared build a nationwide broadband network using 
airwaves next to those used for GPS. Manufacturers of GPS equipment warn 
that strong signals from the planned network could jam existing navigation 
systems.

A technical fix could be expensive — billions of dollars by one estimate — 
and there's no agreement on who should pay. Government officials pledge to 
block LightSquared from turning on its network as scheduled this year unless 
they receive assurances that GPS systems will still work.

The stakes are high not only for the GPS industry and its users, but also 
for those who would use LightSquared's network. In approving it, the Federal 
Communications Commission seeks to boost wireless competition and bring 
faster and cheaper Internet connections to all Americans — even in remote 
corners of the country.

LightSquared and the FCC both insist the new network can co-exist with GPS 
systems. But device makers fear GPS signals will suffer the way a radio 
station can get drowned out by a stronger broadcast in a nearby channel.

The problem, they say, is that sensitive satellite receivers — designed to 
pick up relatively weak signals coming from space — could be overwhelmed 
when LightSquared starts sending high-power signals from as many as 40,000 
transmitters on the ground using the airwaves next door.

"The potential impact of GPS interference is so vast, it's hard to get your 
head around," said Jim Kirkland, vice president and general counsel of 
Trimble Navigation Ltd., which makes GPS systems. "Think 40,000 GPS dead 
spots covering millions of square miles in cities and towns throughout the 
U.S."

One of the biggest risks is to the GPS navigation systems used by about 40 
percent of commercial and private planes. Backup systems that rely on 
ground-based radio signals are not as accurate and have coverage gaps. Some 
older private planes have no backup at all.

With GPS interference, a pilot "may go off course and not even realize it," 
said Chris Dancy, a spokesman for the Aircraft Owners and Pilots 
Association.

LightSquared's network could also undermine the Federal Aviation 
Administration's multi-billion-dollar program to upgrade the nation's 
air-traffic control system, which is based on World War II-era radar 
technology.

The new GPS-based system is more precise and lets planes fly more direct 
routes. That will save airlines time, money and fuel and cut pollution. It 
is also key to accommodating projected increases in airline traffic by 
enabling planes to fly safely closer together.

Public-safety officials, too, are nervous about LightSquared because they 
rely on GPS to track and dispatch police cars, fire trucks and ambulances. 
Many 911 systems also use GPS to help locate people. Disruptions could delay 
responses to emergencies, said Harlin McEwen, an official with the 
International Association of Chiefs of Police.

Even the Pentagon has expressed concern as it relies on GPS to guide planes, 
ships, armored vehicles, weapons and troops.

LightSquared plans to compete nationally with super-fast, fourth-generation 
wireless services being rolled out by the likes of AT&T and Verizon 
Wireless. It won't sell directly to consumers, though. Instead, LightSquared 
will provide network access to companies including Leap Wireless, parent of 
the Cricket phone service, and Best Buy, which will rebrand the service 
under its own name.

LightSquared has its roots as a satellite-phone operator, so its airwaves 
historically have been reserved primarily for satellite communications. FCC 
rules adopted in 2003 allowed the company to back up those signals with 
ground-based wireless service, but only to fill in coverage gaps.

In January, however, the FCC gave LightSquared permission to use its 
airwaves for a broader, conventional wireless data network. Although the 
company will continue to offer satellite service, it plans to cover at least 
92 percent of Americans by 2015 with high-power wireless signals transmitted 
by base stations on earth.

Until now, GPS receivers haven't had much trouble filtering out noise in the 
adjacent airwaves because it consisted mostly of low-power signals beamed 
from space. But GPS manufacturers warn that will change once there is a 
major ground-based broadband network.

Both LightSquared and the FCC say further testing is needed to determine the 
true extent of any interference. The FCC is requiring LightSquared to 
participate in a study group with GPS manufacturers and users.

LightSquared won't be allowed to turn on its network until the government is 
satisfied that any problems are addressed, FCC spokesman Rob Kenny said.

"We have every reason to resolve these concerns because we want to make sure 
there is a robust GPS system," LightSquared executive vice president Jeffrey 
Carlisle said.

Dan Hays, a consultant with the firm PRTM, insists the technical solution is 
straightforward: GPS devices need to include better filters to screen out 
the LightSquared signals.

Estimates on the costs of a fix, however, range widely.

Hays believes it will cost no more than $12 million — or 30 cents per 
device — to install better filters in roughly 40 million standalone GPS 
units made worldwide each year. Cell phones, he said, will be fine because 
they don't rely solely on GPS to determine location and have better filters 
anyway.

But Tim Farrar, a consultant with TMF Associates, insists cellphones need 
upgrades, too — raising the annual cost to as much as $1 billion.

Tens of billions of dollars of existing equipment may also need to be 
replaced, Farrar said.

GPS manufacturers insist that neither they nor their customers should have 
to pay.

That's because GPS receivers were designed to screen out low-power signals 
next door, and now the government is changing the rules, said Scott Burgett, 
software engineering manager with Garmin Ltd.

But Hays said GPS receivers are "eavesdropping on signals outside of where 
they are supposed to be" — in LightSquared's space.

That was not a problem — until now.

Moreover, LightSquared and the FCC say the GPS industry should have been 
preparing for a ground-based network nearby since the FCC first allowed 
backup wireless systems in that space in 2003.

The real dilemma, Hays said, is this: "This is a situation where the 
neighbor built the fence too far over the property line and may not have 
realized it at the time. Now the other neighbor wants to build a pool and 
there is not enough space. So the question is: who has to pay to move the 
fence?"

___

Associated Press Writer Joan Lowy in Washington contributed to this report.

========================================

W0AIB Wonders:  What will this do to or for amateur radio?
_______________________________________________
LarrysList mailing list
LarrysList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.k0jpr.net/mailman/listinfo/larryslist 

To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go to 
www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes

[real-eyes] Fw: [LarrysList] Planned wireless Internet network threatens GPS

Other related posts: