[racktables-users] Re: how to use "Virtual Resources" correctly
- From: Wawrzyniec Niewodniczański <wawrzek.niewodniczanski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:34:53 +0000
On 02/21/11 16:05, Aaron Dummer wrote:
[...]
2. A clustered environment. In this case, multiple physical servers
each run a bare-metal hypervisor and are grouped together in a logical
cluster. One or more resource pools may or may not exist within the
cluster. VMs may be assigned to a pool or to the cluster itself. In
this scenario, either the cluster or resource pool objects would act
as the container for VMs. The cluster would act as the container for
the servers and resource pool objects.
After some investigation I found that used by you (VMWare) naming
convention is a bit different to Xen(Server). In XenServer there are no
Clusters. You add your boxes into Resource Pool, which functionality is
similar (the same) to VMWare Cluster.
So may question. Is it possible to make naming of containers more
flexible? I imagine that other Hypervisors might adopt other naming
convention as well.
Cheers,
Wawrzek
--
Wawrzyniec (Wawrzek) Niewodniczański - 01223 435603 (35603) - wawrzekn
System Administrator - Engineering Services Team (XenServer)
Citrix Systems, Building 101, Cambridge Science Park, CB4 0FY, Cambridge
PhD in Quantum Chemistry, MSc in Molecular Engineering
Other related posts:
