On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) <kissg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Some of our routers do support interchangeable cards that can be placed > > inside the routers' slots. Now we are thinking which is the best way of > > using RT to document this cards and the slots in which those are placed. > > > Could we use the rackspace to do so? How could I do that? Will I have to > > create an object called, i.e., ethernet-card-24-1g and place it in a row > of > > a rack? > > Select a 'network chassis model' and fill it with 'network switch models'. > E.g. there are 23 different Cisco blades in the default dictionary > and you may define more. > Hi Gabor, thanks for your reply ... I knew I could do that. Indeed, I'm using that approach with self defined objects to document VRFs, something that today is not directly supported [1]. My question was trying to point out whether there is a way of, not only documenting parent/child relationships among objects but also its slot/row position. For example, how would document the slot position of 'network switch' inside 'network chassis' ? How could I document that a network switch is located in slot/row 3/4 inside a network chassis? Thanks!! Lucas [1] - https://www.freelists.org/post/racktables-users/Documenting-VRFs-in-Racktables -- "Antes teníamos hambre y mirábamos el reloj para saber qué hora era. Ahora miramos el reloj para saber si tenemos hambre." -- Ernesto Sábato