TL;DR: How do I track the Patch Panels in between my switches without making a bunch of crazy objects? While I have implemented RackTables at several other companies, my current implementation is something I will soon be proud of, with (so far) 4 different companies using it to track our shared network closets and resources. While I await the ability to track overlapping IP scopes inside separate VLANs (Bug #639) and (to a lesser extent) attaching a VLAN tag to a switch port (Bug #1341), I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestion on how to track the links between our network closets. We are set up like this right now: Rack 1:Switch 1:port 1 > Rack 2:PatchPanel1:Port1 > Through structured cabling to network closet elsewhere Rack 10:PatchPanel3:Port10 > Rack 11:Switch11:Port11 Since no patch panels on either side of the structured cabling correlate port numbers (and much of this is fiber so we have 6 strands of fiber on one end with a wall mounted box going to a massive 120 strand rack mount termination box on the other end), I can't just make one object in the middle or something. I will be testing a set up of creating 4 objects, with the 2 patch panel objects each having a duplicate entry for each port ("Port1 - Jack" and "Port1 - Backhaul" or something) to allow us to somehow made a very roundabout but documented connection: Rack 1:Switch 1:port 1 > Rack 2:PatchPanel1:Port1-Jack Rack 2:PatchPanel1:Port1-Backhaul > Rack 10:PatchPanel3:Port10-Backhaul Rack 10:PatchPanel3:Port10-Jack > Rack 11:Switch11:Port11 Sadly though, even with this, we can't easily see whats on the other end without clicking through several objects. Doable, but less than ideal. Without yet considering how to rengineer RackTables to support this (something I can think about but do not have the skills to implement), am I missing an easy way to solve my problem? Thanks! Michael Potts GV: (904) 638-2914 | Gtalk: HM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx @HMHackMaster | http://about.me/MichaelPotts