> > The non-self-centering ability of the flevo is the > > reason, why it is only rideable with a rubber bung > > (steering damper) that brings the FW back to the > > center, after steering. > > Well.... On a vacation, I have been riding my flevo without a damper (it > broke off). The flevo is rideable without. It might have helped that I > am used to a weak silent blocks (not these stiff once used traditionally > on a flevo). Amazing skill. I was neither able to ride one my airbike nor on a friends flevo without damper. The front part just fell into the curve and could not be brought back again. > I rode a short while on Torbens python (a bit to big for me). I could > only do strait lines but could keep balance (200m one direction, > turning, 200m the other). It feels same and also different from a flevo > (difficult to explane). I had the feeling that the bike wanted to go > strait all the time (even if I didn't want that). Yes. Flevo riders have some advantage in learning the python. But still it is different. As you said, especially (left-)curves are almost impossible in the beginning. > Riding may be ok on this bike, but walking with it is really bad. You > have practically to hang over the bike to walk around with it. Could > that not be a good reason to use a (weak) silent blok anyway? Just to be > able to take the python by the seat and walk. If you are not sitting on the python and there is no luggage, the self-centering force is gone. Meanwhile I have learned to walk with the bike. One of the tricks is a slight pushing downwards by the handle to center the front part. The steering stop through the stand that I have built in all my pythons improves the handling and carrying a lot. Regards from Jürgen. ============================================================ This is the Python Mailinglist at freelists.org Listmaster: Juergen Mages jmages@xxxxxx ============================================================