Yes, very odd! This is the 21st century equivalent of the letters that are delivered by the post office decades after they were posted, that we read about in the newspapers from time to time.
John Stockdale =============== Eric Nelson wrote:
Strange, this email came in last night from 2006! Here's the header with munged addresses. EricFrom Laurence Cuffe Fri Dec 1 13:20:18 2006 Return-Path: <> Authentication-Results: mta243.mail.re4.yahoo..com from=freelists.org; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) Received: from 206.53.239.180 (EHLO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by mta243.mail.re4.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:26:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 49227979A75; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03918-02; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id B1F81979A3E; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0..0; list pure-silver); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:17 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: pure-silver@ *Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 683A2979A58 for <pure-silver@>; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03859-02 for <pure-silver@>; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from asmtpout014.mac.com (asmtpout014.mac.com [17.148.16.89]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3B673979A40 for <pure-silver@>; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:16 -0400 (EDT)* MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Received: from [192.168.1.33] ([83.147.138.250]) by asmtp014.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.03 (built Aug 7 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0K72008CINBQNW40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:26:16 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <000501c714b9$018b9a60$0301a8c0@Desktop> References: <C194F1C6.58AA%info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <000501c714b9$018b9a60$0301a8c0@Desktop> Message-id: <4A86EB94-1359-458B-BA6E-3FB1977BE7D1@xxxxxxx> From: Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxxx> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: largest camera ever used Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:20:18 -0500 To: pure-silver@ Sender: pure-silver-bounce@ Errors-to: pure-silver-bounce@ Precedence: normal Reply-to: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx List-help: <mailto:ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <pure-silver-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: pure-silver <pure-silver.freelists.org> List-subscribe: <pure-silver-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jim@, dickburk@> List-post: <mailto:pure-silver@> List-archive: <//www.freelists.org/archives/pure-silver> Content-Length: 1929----- Original Message ---- From: Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxxx> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, December 1, 2006 3:20:18 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: largest camera ever used Ha!An Agfa Mk3 with the potential to use film up to 20x24 inches, although I've only used it with film as large as 16x20. There seems to be fairly sound physics for saying that some where between 5x4 and 8x10 is the golden zone where all the trade offs between diffraction limits, depth of field considerations and film grain maximizes the amount of detail captured on film. Very flat subjects allow one to move a little towards the larger end, but keeping the film flat and aligning everything correctly can compromise your gains there.All the best Larry cuffe On 30 Nov 2006, at 14:52, Dave Valvo wrote: > What is the largest film camera you ever used? >> Mine was a Hycon that had 3 cameras side by side with three rolls > of film that shot simultaneous images one with a red filter, one > with a green filter, and one with a blue filter. Then the B&W > images were put back together using the same filters to make color > images. Each negative was 9.5 inches by 18 inches.> > > Dave >> ===================================================================== >> ========================================>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org <//www.freelists.org> and logon >> to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up >> when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.> > > ====================================================================== > =======================================> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to > your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when > you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.=============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
