[pure-silver] Re: Polaroid instant film may be revived?

  • From: Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:43:22 -0800 (PST)

they tricked me too and i had to look twice when there



________________________________
From: Ray Rogers <earthsoda@xxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:13:52 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Polaroid instant film may be revived?

--- On Mon, 1/19/09, Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"it says they are those are just the first."

Eric,
Indeed it they does;

"Within this section we will shortly present the 7 BIGGEST CHALLENGES on our 
way to the new intergal film because we want to invite you to

1.Cross your fingers for our mission and...." 

English is difficult for all of at times; it seemed on first reading the 7 were 
already there somewhere... perhaps just out of sight on the next page or 
something. Thanks to your comment, I see they were saying NONE of the 7 are 
listed yet.

Ray


--- On Mon, 1/19/09, Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Polaroid instant film may be revived?
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, January 19, 2009, 9:11 PM
> it says they are those are just the first.
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Ray Rogers <earthsoda@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:06:14 PM
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Polaroid instant film may be
> revived?
> 
> Thats the way I am reading it as well... don't know how
> many of us use that 600 series... my only SX-70 interest was
> Lucas Samaras style work... nevertheless,  
> 
> Am I the only one who can't get the "7
> chalanges" to show themselves?
> I push, I click, page changes, but there is no 7 (AND the 2
> that ARE there seem not to be part of the 7, BTW)
> 
> ???
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 1/19/09, Jean-David Beyer
> <jeandavid8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> > It looks to me as though "integral film" is
> the
> > stuff for the SX-70 and similar that include a
> battery. I
> > hope I am wrong, but if I am right, it would not fit
> in a
> > Polaroid back.



      
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.



      

Other related posts: