I've been shooting quite a bit with 3 old Kodak lenses lately out of pure coincidence. A 170mm f6.3 Tessar in a Compound, a 6 3/8 inch Anastigmat in a barrel, and a 80mm Anastar on a Kodak Reflex II TLR. I am very impressed with all 3 of them for sharpness and contrast (lack of coating considered where appropriate) even wide open. All but the Anastar are uncoated. All exhibit excellent OOFA qualities too. I now have all I need, so I'll tell everyone. Don't be afraid of buying them because they're so cheap. I am now a believer, Kodak made darn good lenses. Richard, and anyone else, I've done some portrait work with this 6 3/8 Anastigmat, and frankly I just love it. It softens just slightly wide open and generally gives very pleasant skintone rendition. I've never heard anything good said about Tessar designs for this purpose, with Heliars and such getting all the ink. Is there some technical reason for Tessars to be poopoo'd for portraiture? ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.